Minutes of the 13th February 2025 Teleconference Austin-1445 Page 1 of 1 Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. 14 February 2025 Attendees: Don Cragun, IEEE SA OR Andrew Josey, The Open Group Eric Ackermann, CISPA Eric Blake, Red Hat, The Open Group OR Geoff Clare, The Open Group Mark Brown Apologies Nick Stoughton, USENIX, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 OR Tom Thompson, IEEE Mark Brown joined the meeting to demo the update to the Mantis bug reporting system that we plan to rollout and to agree the downtime we will need to deploy. We went through the new user interface which has the existing features, discussed whether some additional features could be supported and agreed that next week the current austingroupbugs.net site will be down while the software is updated. We confirmed the calendar for upcoming meetings , no meeting on February 20. Next meetings on February 27 and March 6. After the meeting Andrew received confirmation from IEEE that the PAR for TC1 has been approved. * Open Business Bug 1876: clarify, whether a trap action that is executed from a OPEN context where set -e is ignored, would have set -e ignored, too https://www.austingroupbugs.net/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1876 Andrew took an action to ask shell developers to comment on this issue. (completed by sending an email to the reflector: austin-group-l:archive/latest/37925). Bug 864: Insufficient specification of storage requirements for synchronization objects https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=864 We discussed this item that had been tabled until Issue 8 TC 1. AI: Andrew to contact Rich Felker to determine whether or not items 1 an 4 have been resolved by section 2.9.9 and to get suggested wording for changes to address items 2 and 3. The action was completed, but no response received as yet. * Current Business Bug 1904: LC_TIME era start_date (and end_date) possibly mis-specified https://www.austingroupbugs.net/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1904 This was discussed during the 2025-02-13 meeting: Historically, there was no year 0 and the standard is worded to reflect this fact. Is this what implementation actually do? Andrew took an action to ask for input on what other implementations do. (completed on the mailing list) Bug 1905: Conflicting text about async-signal-safety https://www.austingroupbugs.net/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1905 Accepted, resolved, tc1-2024 tag. Bug 1906: Mention O_CLOEXEC and O_CLOFORK in the unistd.h change history. https://www.austingroupbugs.net/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1906 Accepted as marked, resolved, tc1-2024 tag. Bug 1616: Standardize mktemp utility OPEN https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1616 We reviewed the proposals in the bug. The -u option should be omitted, since its use is discouraged. The desired action can be used as a starting point, but needs quite a lot of work on the wording and there are several missing sections. A.I. Eric B: Flesh out the text in the bug report for a fully developed man page. Next Steps ---------- The next calls are on Thu 2025-02-20 NO MEETING Thu 2025-02-27 (WEBEX meeting - general bugs) Thu 2025-03-06 (WEBEX meeting - general bugs) The calls are for 90 minutes Calls are anchored on US time. (8am Pacific) Please check the calendar invites for dial in details. Bugs are at: https://austingroupbugs.net An etherpad is usually up for the meeting, with a URL using the date format as below: https://posix.rhansen.org/p/20xx-mm-dd (For write access this uses The Open Group single sign on, for those individuals with gitlab.opengroup.org accounts. Please contact Andrew if you need to be setup)