Minutes from the October 24 2002 Teleconference Austin-145 Page 1 of 1 Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. October 25, 2002 Attendees: Andrew Josey, Chair Don Cragun, PASC OR Ulrich Drepper The purpose of the call was to review the aardvark reports and editors proposed resolutions for TC1 draft 5, which had been circulated prior to the meeting. Since three ORs were not in attendance it was decided to put off any discussion of new inbound aardvark against the finaltext. Andrew reported that he had converted comments from the IEEE ballot and the IEEE and The Open Group editors into aardvark, resulting in 48 aardvarks. Apart from one which procedurally had to be rejected since it was against a html web page that is not part of the standard they would all result in improvements to the text without substantive change to the comment. For the one comment rejected Andrew confirmed that he had conversed with the submitter and obtained agreement that this was acceptable (note that we have made the fix suggested to the html web page). Don noted that some comments say fix, and that we are assuming that the editors have done the right thing. Andrew confirmed that this was the case. The IEEE ballot obtained 89% return and 100% affirmative (several sets of comments were received from balloters and coordinators). TC1 is thus effectively complete with the editorial changes applied as a result of the review. Due to the impending deadline at IEEE for submission to the standards board we are starting a 10 day recirculation on October 25. This is the final text draft to be submitted for formal approval, and is now available on the Austin Group website. Ulrich asked about plans for an updated paper publication. Andrew responded that in an ideal world this would be in 1Q2003, however we want to create a paper document this time with ISO approval too, and so we need to get TC1 through the ISO process. It was agreed that plans for future corrigendum, if any, will need to be discussed at some point. On a unrelated topic, an issue was raised about the spelling of the word Cancelation --- this looks like we need to fix that up to be Cancellation (we managed to check the US spelling from the American Heritage Dictionary). It is suggested that we can handle this editorially at the next instance of the paper publication or in erratum. The Next call is scheduled for two weeks time on November 7 - Thursday 4pm . The topic will be back to looking at inbound aardvark (http://www.opengroup.org/austin/aardvark/finaltext/)