Minutes of the 3rd April 2025 Teleconference Austin-1451 Page 1 of 1 Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. 4th April 2025 Attendees: Don Cragun, IEEE SA OR Andrew Josey, The Open Group Nick Stoughton, USENIX, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 OR Geoff Clare, The Open Group Mark Brown Haelwenn Monnier, The Open Group Eric Ackermann, CISPA We confirmed the calendar for upcoming meetings, there is no meeting on April 17th, the next one after that being April 24th. The ISO status is that SC22 has circulated N5989 which is a resolution to withdraw revision of ISO/IEC 9945. Wording is as follows: "To allow for all three organizations ISO/IEC JTC1, The Open Group, and IEEE to have the identical standard for POSIX, the SC 22 leadership is requesting the following CIB resolution. Do you approve the following? CIB Resolution 25-02: Withdrawal of the Revision of ISO/IEC 9945 SC 22 agrees to withdraw the revision of ISO/IEC 9945 with the intent to process the revision of the ISO/IEC 9945 as adoption under the ISO/IEEE PSDO." The vote closes on 2025-04-29. After that date IEEE will then submit under the ISO/IEEE PSDO process. * Open Business Bug 1876: clarify, whether a trap action that is executed from a OPEN context where set -e is ignored, would have set -e ignored, too https://www.austingroupbugs.net/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1876 Andrew took an action to ask shell developers to comment on this issue. (completed by sending an email to the reflector: austin-group-l:archive/latest/37925). Bug 864: Insufficient specification of storage requirements for synchronization objects https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=864 AI: Andrew to contact Rich Felker to determine whether or not items 1 an 4 have been resolved by section 2.9.9 and to get suggested wording for changes to address items 2 and 3. The action was completed, but no response received as yet. Bug 1904: LC_TIME era start_date (and end_date) possibly mis-specified https://www.austingroupbugs.net/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1904 This was discussed during the 2025-02-13 meeting: Historically, there was no year 0 and the standard is worded to reflect this fact. Is this what implementation actually do? Andrew had completed an action to ask for input on what other implementations do and some feedback has been received so need to return to this on a future call. * Current Business We discussed whether to close bug 1893 (onlinepubs). It was felt that after the general update to the document converter remaining issues will need to be considered individually. We should look to close this item soon. We skipped over bug 1913 and will wait for feedback from Chet Ramey. Bug 1915: clarification of 2.6.5 field splitting of 2.5.2 special parameter $* https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1915 We need the shell authors to decide on this item. 2025-03-27: AI Andrew: Ask shell developers for guidance on requirements. The action from last week was completed and this item is awaiting input. As there were no new bugs we closed the meeting early. Next Steps We will start on bug 1913 next time. The next calls are on Thu 2025-04-10 (WEBEX meeting - general bugs) Thu 2025-04-10 NO MEETING Thu 2025-04-24 (WEBEX meeting - general bugs) The calls are for 90 minutes Calls are anchored on US time. (8am Pacific) Please check the calendar invites for dial in details. Bugs are at: https://austingroupbugs.net An etherpad is usually up for the meeting, with a URL using the date format as below: https://posix.rhansen.org/p/20xx-mm-dd (For write access this uses The Open Group single sign on, for those individuals with gitlab.opengroup.org accounts. Please contact Andrew if you need to be setup)