Minutes from the November 7 2002 Teleconference Austin-146 Page 1 of 1 Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. November 8, 2002 Attendees: Andrew Josey Don Cragun Alexander Terekhov Ulrich Drepper Nick Stoughton The purpose of the call was to review the aardvark reports against the finaltext: http://www.opengroup.org/austin/aardvark/finaltext/ We worked through to number 27, the summaries are below. It will likely take several meetings before these are closed fully. The approach for now is to consider the technical solution, with decisions TBD later for the track (interpretation, tc, etc) to run the changes down. The next call will be on November 14, at 4pm UK, 8am UK to pick up at XSH ERN 28 and to revisit any open items. This batch of aardvark will be frozen so that the numbers of the items will not change. Andrew will update the aardvark at URL to reflect the comments below. ERN Summary http://www.opengroup.org/austin/aardvark/finaltext/xshbug.txt _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 1 gwc@opengroup.org Defect in XSH 2.2.2 (rdvk# 39) [math FP prefix] Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:05:21 +0100 _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 2 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH aio_cancel() (rdvk# 31) {ud-process-1} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 05:46:18 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 3 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH aio_fsync() (rdvk# 30) {ud-process-2} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 05:48:04 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 4 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH aio_read() (rdvk# 29) {ud-process-3} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 05:54:41 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_____ Accept as marked below_X___ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: If prioritized I/O is supported for this file, then the asynchronous operation shall be submitted at a priority equal to the scheduling priority of the process [TPS]or thread[/TPS] minus aiocbp->aio_reqprio. _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 5 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH aio_read() (rdvk# 27) {ud-process-4} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 05:56:35 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 6 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH aio_write() (rdvk# 26) {ud-process-5} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 05:59:55 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_____ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: Same approach as per #4 _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 7 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH aio_write() (rdvk# 25) {ud-process-6} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 06:01:53 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: OK with the change, an alternate way for this specific case would be to remove the words "to the calling process" _____________________________________________________________________________ COMMENT Enhancement Request Number 8 wollman@lcs.mit.edu Defect in XSH atexit (rdvk# 38) {GAW-2002g} Fri, 6 Sep 2002 20:02:18 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_____ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____OPEN Rationale for rejected or partial changes: Action: on Andrew to look for discussions on the mailing list regarding atexit application usage _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 9 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH pthread_sigmask() (rdvk# 23) {ud-process-9} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 06:38:21 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_____ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____OPEN Rationale for rejected or partial changes: We were leaning towards an Accept but felt we should run this by Dave Butenhof for comment _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 10 wollman@lcs.mit.edu Defect in XSH fchmod (rdvk# 40) {GAW-2002-fchmod} Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:25:07 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_____ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: Some discussion. The majority felt that unspecified was enough and the point was that a portable application should not call fchmod() on a socket. The minority feeling that undefined would be better. Better to leave as is for now. _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 11 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH fclose() (rdvk# 22) {ud-process-10} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 06:47:38 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 12 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH fclose() (rdvk# 21) {ud-process-11} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 06:51:22 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept__X__ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 13 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH fclose() (rdvk# 20) {ud-process-12} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 06:52:44 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 14 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH fclose() (rdvk# 19) {ud-process-13} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 06:53:38 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ COMMENT Enhancement Request Number 15 ajosey@opengroup.org Defect in XSH fpathconf (rdvk# 34) {_PC.adv.stuff} Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:33:26 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_____ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____OPEN Rationale for rejected or partial changes: Needs to be forwarded to the PASC SSWG-RT for comment _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 16 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH fputc() (rdvk# 18) {ud-process-14} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 06:58:23 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 17 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH fputwc() (rdvk# 17) {ud-process-15} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 06:59:31 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 18 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH fseek() (rdvk# 15) {ud-process-16} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:01:08 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 19 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH fsetpos() (rdvk# 16) {ud-process-17} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:06:07 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ COMMENT Enhancement Request Number 20 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH getrlimit() (rdvk# 13) {ud-process-18} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:22:14 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_____ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____OPEN Rationale for rejected or partial changes: Fwd to Base WG _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 21 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH getsockopt() (rdvk# 5) {ud-shall-1} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:21:49 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 22 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH getsockopt() (rdvk# 11) {ud-process-19} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:28:01 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 23 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH getsockopt() (rdvk# 10) {ud-process-20} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:29:53 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 24 joannaf@sun.com Defect in XSH isunordered (rdvk# 36) {jf-zal-isunordered1} Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:23:58 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 25 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH nanosleep() (rdvk# 9) {ud-process-21} Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:47:56 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_X___ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 26 drepper@redhat.com Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() (rdvk# 1) {ud-cv-1} Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:17:11 +0100 (BST) _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_____ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____OPEN Rationale for rejected or partial changes: Action: AJ to ask SSWG-RT Do we have to check all parameters in all cases? If we make it a shall,we will have to _____________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTION Enhancement Request Number 27 terekhov@de.ibm.com Defect in XSH pthread_detach() (rdvk# 43) {alt-detach-2002-11-06} Wed, 6 Nov 2002 18:46:23 GMT _____________________________________________________________________________ Accept_____ Accept as marked below_____ Duplicate_____ Reject_____ Rationale for rejected or partial changes: No change. Some questions over the language of the error text Does "implementation has detected" mean this is really a may fail?