ISO Ballot on XRAT TC1 Austin-160 Page 1 of 1 Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. February 21, 2003 -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Deane [mailto:mdeane@ANSI.org] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:53 AM To: 'SC 22 Distribution List' Subject: (SC22docs.1888) SC 22 N 3549 - Summary of Voting on SC 22 N 3512, DCOR 1 to ISO/I EC 9945-4 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Programming languages, their environments and system software interfaces Secretariat: U.S.A. (ANSI) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 N3549 TITLE: Summary of Voting on SC 22 N 3512, Letter Ballot for Draft Technical Corrigendum 1 for ISO/IEC 9945-4:2002, POSIX - Part 4: Rationale DATE ASSIGNED: 2003-02-20 SOURCE: SC 22 Secretariat BACKWARD POINTER: N/A DOCUMENT TYPE: Summary of Voting PROJECT NUMBER: 22.21.04.01.01 STATUS: The NB comments are sent to WG 15 for resolution, preparation of the disposition of comments report, and preparation of the final text for publication. ACTION IDENTIFIER: ACT DUE DATE: N/A DISTRIBUTION: Text CROSS REFERENCE: N3512 DISTRIBUTION FORM: Def Address reply to: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 Secretariat Matt Deane ANSI 11 West 42nd Street New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 642-4992 Fax: (212) 840-2298 Email: mdeane@ansi.org _______ end of title page; beginning of summary ______________ SUMMARY OF VOTING ON Letter Ballot: SC22 N3512 Circulated by: JTC 1/SC22 Circulation Date: 2002-10-31 Closing Date: 2003-01-31 SUBJECT: Summary of Voting on SC 22 N 3512, Letter Ballot for Draft Technical Corrigendum 1 for ISO/IEC 9945-4:2002, POSIX - Part 4: Rationale ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The following responses have been received on the subject of approval: "P" Members supporting approval without comment 10 (Canada, China, Czech Republic, Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea, Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom, USA) "P" Members supporting approval with comments 1 (Norway) "P" Members not supporting approval - "P" Members abstaining 1 (France) "P" Members not voting 12 (Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, Ireland, DPR of Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovenia, Ukraine) ___________ end of summary, beginning of NB comments _____________ Norway 1. As the document is referencing to an ISO standard, it should refer to it. We propose the changes to be: In the title: add ISO/IEC 9945-1 9945-2 etc. like in: "ISO/IEC 9945-1:2002/COR 1:200x and IEEE P1003.1-2001/Cor 1-200x Draft Standard ..." In the Abstract add the same reference, as in: "Abstract: This Technical Corrigendum adresses problems discovered since the approval of ISO/IEC 9945-1:2002 and IEEE Std P1003.1-2001. These are mainly due to resolving integration issues raised by the merger of the Base documents that went into ISO/IEC 9945-1:2002 and IEEE Std P1003.1-:2001" 2. As the 4 ISO 9945 parts should be handled as a whole, there should only be one combined corrigendum.