Austin Group Minutes of the 4 August Teleconference Austin-265 Page 1 of 1
Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group.              August 5, 2005

Attendees
Andrew Josey, The Open Group
Don Cragun , Sun, PASC OR
Geoff Clare , The Open Group
Ulrich Drepper, Red Hat
Mark Brown, IBM, TOG OR
Nick Stoughton, USENIX, ISO/IEC OR
Mats Wichmann, Intel (on IRC only)

We also had an IRC channel open for this call

 	 irc://irc.freestandards.org/austin

Action item review 
---------------------
Just the updates on Austin/240r1 are noted here.

ACTION AI-2005-01-09 Andrew Josey & Mats Wichmann to propose a time and place
for a joint Austin group/LSB Workgroup meeting to consider LSB/POSIX
conflicts, to be held as soon as conveniently possible.
Status: OPEN

LSB 3.0 is done. 
We do not anticipate any major changes to the conflicts document.
Nick still has an action to prepare an agenda for a teleconference.
ACTION: Andrew Do final review pass on the Technical Report document.


ACTION AI-2005-01-06: AJ to contact Jack McCann at HP for views on
getnameinfo document, and for any other networking issues that may
concern us. 
Status: OPEN, looking for a volunteer to acts as a liaison to
the networking folks at IETF. Don reported that he
had a possible volunteer Sebastien Roy  at Sun.
ACTION : Andrew to contact Sebastien


Defect Report Processing
-------------------------
The group picked up on the latest batch of defect reports,
which are available at the following URL:
http://www.opengroup.org/austin/aardvark/latest/

XSH ERN 89 setpgrp OPEN

ACTION: Andrew will ping the requestor


XSH C99 TC2 maths related ERNs

The following changes are based on the email submission from 
Geoff 
http://www.opengroup.org/austin/mailarchives/ag/msg08526.html

The standard developers chose to leave the underflow issue aside for now .

XSH ERN 69 fma

    ISO C TC2 #57 adds a "may" range error for non-MX systems.
    The Annex F requirements (for MX systems) are unchanged.

    After line 12499 add a new paragraph:

	If the result overflows or underflows, a range error may
	occur. [MX] On systems that support the MX option, if the
	result overflows a range error shall occur.[/MX]

    Remove the MX shading from lines 12527-12531 (the "may fail"
    underflow range error), and add an unshaded overflow range error
    to the "may fail" block.


XSH ERN 71 ilogb

    Although this one has been closed, I have noticed a couple of
    minor problems with the resolution.  One is that detailed changes
    to the RETURN VALUE section are only given for the "x is zero"
    case - the significance of the "and subsequent lines" part of the
    editing instructions could easily be missed when they are applied
    (or it could be applied to too many lines).  The other is that,
    since ISO C TC2 allows either a domain error or a range error for
    these cases but we are only allowing a domain error, should we not
    CX shade a suitable part of the text?

    The following is an updated resolution.

    Replace line 20039 with:

	If x is 0, the value FP_ILOGB0 shall be returned.
	[XSI] On XSI-conformant systems a domain error shall
	occur,[/XSI] otherwise a
	[CX] domain [/CX] error may occur.

    Replace line 20040 with:

	If x is ±Inf, the value INT_MAX shall be returned.
	[XSI] On XSI-conformant systems a domain error shall
	occur,[/XSI] otherwise a
	[CX] domain [/CX] error may occur.

    Replace line 20041 with:

	If x is a NaN, the value FP_ILOGBNAN shall be returned.
	[XSI] On XSI-conformant systems a domain error shall
	occur,[/XSI] otherwise a
	[CX] domain [/CX] error may occur.

    In the ERRORS section, add a "may fail" block, with an unshaded
    domain error for the "zero, NaN, or ±Inf" cases.

XSH ERN 72 and 73 ilogb

    ISO C TC2 #49 adds a statement that an unspecified value is
    returned if the correct value is outside the range of the return
    type.  POSIX/SUS requires specific return values for XSI systems,
    but we ought to add the new statement for non-XSI systems.

    ISO C TC2 #79 makes the same addition in the Annex F requirements
    (for MX systems) but also adds a requirement that the "invalid"
    floating-point exception is raised.  We already require this (via
    the domain error description) for XSI systems but need to extend
    the requirement to (non-XSI) MX systems.

    Replace lines 20042-20045 with:

	If the correct value is greater than INT_MAX, [MX] a domain
	error shall occur and [/MX] an unspecified value shall be
	returned.
	[XSI] On XSI-conformant systems, a domain error shall occur
	and INT_MAX shall be returned.[/XSI]

	If the correct value is less than INT_MIN, [MX] a domain
	error shall occur and [/MX] an unspecified value shall be
	returned.
	[XSI] On XSI-conformant systems, a domain error shall occur
	and INT_MIN shall be returned.[/XSI]

    In the ERRORS section, the description of the "shall fail" domain
    error needs to be split in two, so that the "correct value not
    representable" part is shaded MX|XSI and the "zero, NaN, or ±Inf"
    part is shaded XSI.

XSH ERN 74 llrint

    ISO C TC2 #53 relaxes the requirements for non-MX systems for
    the "outside the range of the return type" case from a "may"
    range error to a "may" domain or range error.  The Annex F
    requirements (for MX systems) are unchanged.

    Replace lines 23266-23269 with:

	If the correct value is positive and too large to represent
	as a long long, an unspecified value shall be returned.
	[MX] On systems that support the MX option, a domain error
	shall occur,[/MX] otherwise a
	[CX] domain [/CX] error may occur.

	If the correct value is negative and too large to represent
	as a long long, an unspecified value shall be returned.
	[MX] On systems that support the MX option, a domain error
	shall occur,[/MX] otherwise a
	[CX] domain [/CX] error may occur.

    In the ERRORS section add a "may fail" block with an unshaded
    domain error for the "correct value is not representable as an
    integer" case.

XSH ERN 75 llround

    ISO C TC2 #54 relaxes the requirements for non-MX systems for
    the "outside the range of the return type" case from a "may"
    range error to a "may" domain or range error.  The Annex F
    requirements (for MX systems) are unchanged.

    Replace lines 23318-23321 with:

	If the correct value is positive and too large to represent
	as a long long, an unspecified value shall be returned.
	[MX] On systems that support the MX option, a domain error
	shall occur,[/MX] otherwise a
	[CX] domain [/CX] error may occur.

	If the correct value is negative and too large to represent
	as a long long, an unspecified value shall be returned.
	[MX] On systems that support the MX option, a domain error
	shall occur,[/MX] otherwise a
	[CX] domain [/CX] error may occur.

    In the ERRORS section add a "may fail" block with an unshaded
    domain error for the "correct value is not representable as an
    integer" case.

XSH ERN 76 logb

    ISO C TC2 #50 relaxes the requirements for non-MX systems for
    the "argument is zero" case from a "may" domain error to a
    "may" domain or range error.  The Annex F requirements (for
    MX systems) are unchanged.

    Replace lines 24027-24028 with:

	If x is 0, logb(), logbf(), and logbl() shall return
	-HUGE_VAL, -HUGE_VALF, and -HUGE_VALL, respectively.
	[MX] On systems that support the MX option a pole error
	shall occur,[/MX] otherwise a
	[CX] pole [/CX] error may occur.

    In the ERRORS section add MX shading to the "shall fail" pole
    error, and add a "may fail" block with an unshaded pole error for
    the "x is 0" case.

XSH ERN 77 lrint

    The changes needed are equivalent to those specified for llrint()
    in XSH ERN 74 (but with "long long" changed to "long").

XSH ERN 78 lround

    The changes needed are equivalent to those specified for llround()
    in XSH ERN 75 (but with "long long" changed to "long").

XSH ERN 79 nexttoward

    ISO C TC2 #80 has no impact on POSIX/SUS.
    (Since no change is needed, the aardvark should be marked Reject.)

XSH ERN 81 pow

    ISO C TC2 #51 relaxes the requirements for non-MX systems for
    the "x is zero and y is less than zero" case(s) from a "may" domain
    error to a "may" domain or range error.  The Annex F requirements
    (for MX systems) are unchanged.

    Replace lines 31424-31427 with:

	For y < 0, if x is zero, a [CX] pole [/CX] error may occur and
	pow(), powf(), and powl() shall return ±HUGE_VAL, ±HUGE_VALF,
	and ±HUGE_VALL, respectively.
	[MX] On systems that support the MX option a pole error shall
	occur and pow(), powf(), and powl() shall return ±HUGE_VAL,
	±HUGE_VALF, and ±HUGE_VALL, respectively if y is an odd
	integer, or HUGE_VAL, HUGE_VALF, and HUGE_VALL, respectively
	if y is not an odd integer.[/MX]

    (These lines could also be moved to after 31407 if desired.)

    In the ERRORS section add a "may fail" block with an unshaded pole
    error for the "x is zero and y is negative" case.


XSH ERN 82 remainder

    ISO C TC2 #55 clarifies the allowed behaviour(s) for non-MX systems
    when y is zero.  The Annex F requirements (for MX systems) are
    unchanged.

    Insert a new paragraph after line 38475:

	On systems that do not support the MX option, if y is zero it
	is implementation-defined whether a domain error occurs or
	zero is returned.

    In the ERRORS section add a "may fail" block with an unshaded
    domain error for the "y is zero" case.

XSH ERN 83 remquo

    ISO C TC2 #56 does the same for remquo() as #55 does for remainder()
    but also adds a statement about the value of *quo being unspecified
    when y is zero.

    The changes needed are equivalent to those specified for remainder()
    in XSH ERN 82, plus an additional change:

    Append to line 38578:

	"If y is zero, the value stored in the object pointed to by
	quo is unspecified."

XSH ERN 85 tgamma

    ISO C TC2 #52 relaxes the requirements for non-MX systems for
    the negative integer and zero cases from a "shall" domain error
    to a "may" domain or range error.  The Annex F requirements
    (for MX systems) are unchanged.

    Replace lines 47772-47773 with:

	If x is a negative integer, a [CX] domain [/CX] error may
	occur and either a NaN (if supported) or an
	implementation-defined value shall be returned.
	[MX] On systems that support the MX option a domain error
	shall occur and a NaN shall be returned.[/MX]

	If x is zero, tgamma(), tgammaf(), and tgammal() shall
	return ±HUGE_VAL, ±HUGE_VALF, and ±HUGE_VALL, respectively.
	[MX] On systems that support the MX option a pole error shall
	occur,[/MX] otherwise a
	[CX] pole [/CX] error may occur.

    Delete lines 47779-47780.

    In the ERRORS section add a "may fail" block with an unshaded
    domain error for the "x is a negative integer" case and an
    unshaded pole error for the "x is zero" case.  Extend the MX
    shading to the whole of the "shall fail" domain error.

-- end of c99 maths --


XSH ERN 102 connect and sendto OPEN 

Leave open until the next meeting
 

XSH ERN 103 posix_openpt example duplicate of XSH ERN  51

XSH ERN 104 posix_trace_create_withlog fd usage Accept as marked below

The behavior described is undefined.
If you use the same file descriptor for multiple 
trace streams  destructive behavior can occur, in the same
way as if you were using any function that manipulates file descriptor .
No change to the standard is required.


XBD ERN 58 XBD 12.1  Accept


Next Steps
-----------
Andrew  will update the aardvark reports with the latest inbound
defect reports.

The next call is  Thursday September 8 2005 
irc://irc.freestandards.org/austin