Austin Group Minutes of the 15 Feb 2007  Teleconference Austin-338 Page 1 of 1
Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group.              February 16, 2007

Attendees
Andrew Josey, The Open Group
Don Cragun , Sun, PASC OR
Geoff Clare, The Open group
Nick Stoughton, USENIX, ISO/IEC OR
Ulrich Drepper, Red Hat

Apologies
Mark Brown, IBM, TOG OR 

Action item review 
---------------------

ACTION 2005-01-01: Don Cragun to present paper on pathname resolution.
OPEN

ACTION 2006-09-01: Ulrich Drepper to prepare a paper making a
recommendation on imaginary type in C99.
OPEN

ACTION 2006-09-02: Ulrich and Nick to develop a draft PAR and criteria
for C++ POSIX binding for discussion.
OPEN (in progress)

Draft PAR circulated Nov 20 for comment. PMC Criteria still to be 
developed.
Ulrich will send out a note to remind folks about this.

ACTION 2006-09-13: Andrew to make a pass through current closed
aardvarks against approved std, to move items to SD-5 or interpretations when
ready. 
Closed for D2R, but ongoing . See Austin/325 for the list of
specific changes for D2R from SD/5. Andrew submitted more
interpretations into the pipe at the end of January 2007.

Action AI-2006-06-01: 
Andrew to work out the full set of changes for recirculation for XSH ERN 132
OPEN, ongoing in progress

Draft Status
------------
Andrew finished processing the inbound aardvark

The rdvk counts for D2 are:

XBD 100
XCU 142
XSH 67
XRAT 13


Next Face to Face meeting
------------------------
See the agenda for more information:
http://www.opengroup.org/austin/agenda.html


Aardvark Bug Reports
--------------------
We picked up on the current aardvark
http://www.opengroup.org/austin/aardvark/latest/

XSH ERN 191 strerror Accept

XSH ERN 139 tdelete OPEN

In RETURN VALUE XSH page 1528 lines 47575-47576
Change from:

The tdelete() function shall return a pointer to the parent of the
deleted node, or a null pointer if the node is not found.

to:
The tdelete() function shall return a pointer to the parent of the
deleted node, or an unspecified non-null pointer if the deleted node
was the root node,  or a null pointer if the node is not found.


APP USAGE needs to include text

Since the return value of tdelete() is an unspecified non-null pointer
in the case that the root of the tree has been deleted, applications
should only use the return value of tdelete() as indication of success or
failure and should not assume it can be dereferenced. Some implementations
in this case will return a pointer to the new root of the tree, other
implementations return arbitrary non-null pointers.

There may also need to be a change in DESCRIPTION
Leave this open to the next meeting for more feedback.

Next Steps
-----------
Andrew  will update the aardvark reports with the latest inbound
defect reports.

Next teleconference meeting will be during the face to face meeting

See http://www.opengroup.org/austin/.
An IRC  channel will be available for the meeting
 irc://irc.freestandards.org #austin

irc://irc.freestandards.org/austin
ICAL: http://www.google.com/calendar/ical/nvctqtstkuni3fab9k3jqtrt4g@group.calendar.google.com/public/basic
XML: http://www.google.com/calendar/feeds/nvctqtstkuni3fab9k3jqtrt4g@group.calendar.google.com/public/basic