Re: thread-private working directory

[Harti Brandt <yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Alexander Terekhov wrote:

AT>Harti Brandt wrote:
AT>[...]
AT>> I wonder how one would implement a per-thread current directory
AT>> in an environment where there is no 1:1 mapping between user
AT>> threads and kernel threads.
AT>
AT>Something similar to (but probably a bit less convoluted ;-) )
AT>a per-thread signal mask, I guess.
AT>
AT>> While I could think of ways, they seem too convoluted to me.

Given that I have only one per-process current working directory this
would force me to intercept all systemcalls that contain pathnames and
fiddle with these, doesn't it?

harti
-- 
harti brandt,
http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private
yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxx