Re: comment on TC documents

["Alexander Terekhov" <yyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Lois Goldthwaite wrote:
>
> FWIW, the C++ standard's recent TC takes the form of a complete new
> document with the changes integrated. But then our list of changes was
> NOT a short html document. :-)

Yeah, "FWIW"(*).

http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2001/n1316

This one still works (until tomorrow, I guess), but is
~85000 bytes smaller (body.pdf) than the one that I've
downloaded a couple of months ago -- probably the stuff
that is now "available" here:

http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG21/prot/14882fdis/n1334

regards,
alexander.

(*) http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3D6E20B4.6F855683%40web.de

"...
 standards committee have ALREADY legislated and proclaimed
 that the standard C{9899:1990,9899/Amd.1:1995} library (a
 subset of the standard C++ library) SHALL NOT THROW[2]:
 ...
 [2] That's really "kinda funny"... given that quite a few
 *standard* C library functions HAVE BEEN DECLARED TO BE
 THREAD CANCELLATION POINTS BY >>THE POSIX STANDARDS
 COMMITTEE<<..."