Re: Defect in XBD 6.4

[yyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxx]

In a message dated 2003-02-25 12:33:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, bmark@xxxxxx writes:

> I urge great caution about changes in this area, we spent a great deal of 
> effort
> to get this to where it is now.


Caution is fine, especially on the fuyure directions stuff... but I do think 
this is a legitimate Ooops, and if someone wants to clean up my phrasing 
a bit, that's fine too. :-) I realize what I proposed may break some existing 
chardef files, but right now all disambiguation schemes that have been 
implemented are unspecified as to method, and thus unlikely to be portable.
I'd finf it hard to believe that this change would cause too many regressions.

Cheers,
Mark