| To: | yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Defect in XCU diff |
| From: | yyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:24:35 GMT |
Defect report from : Glenn McGrath , Debian
(Please direct followup comments direct to yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
@ page 0 line 0 section diff comment {cruftydiff}
Problem:
Edition of Specification (Year): 2003
Defect code : 2. Omission
Diff is utility that compares two files and outputs the difference, it is
commonly used in software development to share updated source code.
POSIX mentions 3 formats that the difference can be described in, these formats
are specified using the -e (ed format), -f (modified ed) and -c (context diff).
There is another format which is similar to your context diff, it is called a
unified diff, for an implementation please refer to the GNU diff program.
Ive been an active member of the open source computing for a number of years
and i would estimate unified diff is used in over 95% of diff's i have seen.
I feel the omision of the default format of diff reflects very poorly on what
otherwise appears to be a fairly accurate standard.
Action:
I recommend you incude the unified diff format, you may also want to make some
of the other formats as obsolete or depreciated.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Defect in XSH posix_fadvise, Geoff Clare |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Defect in XCU locale, ru |
| Previous by Thread: | Defect in XCU diff, eggert |
| Next by Thread: | Defect in XCU diff, nick |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |