Email List: Xaustin-review-lX
[All Lists]

RE: Subject: BUG in sched_setscheduler() (TC2-XSH)

To: yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Subject: BUG in sched_setscheduler() (TC2-XSH)
From: Schwarz Konrad <yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:05:01 +0200
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael T Kerrisk [mailto:yyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 12:52 PM
> To: yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Subject: BUG in sched_setscheduler() (TC2-XSH)
> 
> 
> @ page <no.> line <no.> section <no.> comment
> Problem:
> 
> In the specification of sched_setparam(), there is the statement:
> 
>     The target process, whether it is running or not running, shall 
>     be moved to the tail of the thread list for its priority.
> 

I've always felt this wording too specific -- what happens if threads aren't
managed on lists but on tree-shaped priority queues?  POSIX-noncompliance?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>