| To: | yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Subject: BUG in sched_setscheduler() (TC2-XSH) |
| From: | Schwarz Konrad <yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:05:01 +0200 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael T Kerrisk [mailto:yyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 12:52 PM > To: yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Subject: BUG in sched_setscheduler() (TC2-XSH) > > > @ page <no.> line <no.> section <no.> comment > Problem: > > In the specification of sched_setparam(), there is the statement: > > The target process, whether it is running or not running, shall > be moved to the tail of the thread list for its priority. > I've always felt this wording too specific -- what happens if threads aren't managed on lists but on tree-shaped priority queues? POSIX-noncompliance? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Subject: BUG in sched_setscheduler() (TC2-XSH), Michael T Kerrisk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Defect in XSH posix_openpt, nick |
| Previous by Thread: | Subject: BUG in sched_setscheduler() (TC2-XSH), Michael T Kerrisk |
| Next by Thread: | Defect in XSH posix_openpt, nick |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |