| To: | yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Defect in XSH fork() |
| From: | yyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Jan 2006 08:48:16 GMT |
| Resent-date: | Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:15:08 +0000 |
| Resent-from: | Andrew Josey <yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Resent-message-id: | <1060105161508.ZM5146@xxxxxx> |
| Resent-to: | yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Defect report from : Ulrich Drepper , Red Hat, Inc. (Please direct followup comments direct to yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) @ page 403 line 13030 section fork() objection [ud-fork-aio] Problem: Edition of Specification (Year): 2004 Defect code : 2. Omission The spec says that no AIO request is inherited by the child after fork. It further says that after fork() and before an exec function only async-safe interfaces can be called. Unfortunately aio_error(), aio_return(), and aio_suspend() fall into this category. It is OK to call these functions. What isn't specified is what the state of the aio control blocks is and therefore how these functions have to behave. Action: One possible solution is to declare all control blocks invalid and require that EINVAL is returned. In this case add at the end of line 13030: All aio control blocks are marked invalid. Another possibility is that all requeuests are assumed to be canceled. In this case add at the end of 13030: All outstanding AIO requests are marked as canceled. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Defect in XSH lio_listio(), drepper |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Defect in XSH Threads, drepper |
| Previous by Thread: | Change to defect form, Andrew Josey |
| Next by Thread: | Defect in XSH shm_open, Geoff Clare |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |