| To: | Paul Eggert <yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Defect in XSH utimes |
| From: | Ulrich Drepper <yyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 03 Mar 2006 20:09:22 -0800 |
| Cc: | yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Red Hat, Inc. |
| References: | <200603031846.SAA20757@xxxxxx> <87irqvozz4.fsf@xxxxxx> <1141431168.23855.136.camel@collie> <877j7aq2xf.fsf@xxxxxx> |
Paul Eggert wrote: > If the Solaris futimesat() interface is carved in stone, then we could > call the variant with struct timespec 'utimesat', as H. Peter Anvin > suggested (as the leading 'f' is somewhat weird anyway). That's just because Peter doesn't understand the interface completely. Without a name (i.e., pass NULL) futimesat corresponds to what is futimes on many platforms. Therefore the 'f' is completely fine. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Defect in XSH utimes, Paul Eggert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Defect in XSH utimes, H. Peter Anvin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Defect in XSH utimes, Paul Eggert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Defect in XSH utimes, H. Peter Anvin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |