Email List: Xaustin-review-lX
[All Lists]

Re: Defect in XCU find

To: Geoff Clare <gwc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Defect in XCU find
From: Nick Stoughton <nick@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:17:16 -0800
Cc: austin-review-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: USENIX
References: <20070202165243.GA5610@xxxxxx>
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 16:52 +0000, Geoff Clare wrote:

> Action:
> 
> Change
> 
>     "The path operand is a pathname of a starting point in the
>     directory hierarchy."
> 
> to
> 
>     "The first operand and subsequent operands up to but not
>     including the first operand that starts with a '-', or is a '!'
>     or a '(', shall be interpreted as path operands.  If the first
>     operand starts with a '-', or is a '!' or a '(', the behavior
>     is unspecified.  Each path operand is a pathname of a starting
>     point in the directory hierarchy."
> 
Following on from the utility syntax guideline discussions, I would also
suggest adding to APPLICATION USAGE (p457, after line 17715):

If a pathname starts with a '-', or is '!' or '(', applications should
prefix this with "./", e.g. "find ./! -name . -print".
-- 
Nick

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>