Mail Index

July 24, 2008

Re: Bug in XSHd5.1 tgamma, Geoff Clare, 16:47
Re: Bug in XSHd5.1 tgamma, Geoff Clare, 16:15
Re: Bug in XSHd5.1 tgamma, Fred J. Tydeman, 15:51
Re: Bug in XSHd5.1 tgamma, Fred J. Tydeman, 15:34
Re: Bug in XSHd5.1 tgamma, Geoff Clare, 12:46
Re: Bug in XSHd5.1 tgamma, Bruce Evans, 12:10
Re: Bug in XSHd5.1 tgamma, Michael Kerrisk, 12:02
Re: Bug in XSHd5.1 tgamma, Michael Kerrisk, 11:51
Re: Bug in XSHd5.1 tgamma, Geoff Clare, 10:33

July 21, 2008

Re: Use of +/- notation in math function specs, Michael Kerrisk, 16:10
Re: Use of +/- notation in math function specs, Fred J. Tydeman, 14:37
Use of +/- notation in math function specs, Michael Kerrisk, 14:03
Re: Defect in XSH setlocale, Geoff Clare, 09:25

July 20, 2008

Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), David Butenhof, 15:49
Re: meaning of "the process is blocking [a specific signal]", Philip Guenther, 00:11

July 19, 2008

Re: mlockall and "mapped", Roland McGrath, 05:28

July 18, 2008

Re: mlockall and "mapped", Ted Baker, 19:11
Re: mlockall and "mapped", Ulrich Drepper, 18:10
Re: mlockall and "mapped", Ted Baker, 17:38
mlockall and "mapped", Ulrich Drepper, 17:27

July 17, 2008

Re: sigaction and sigaltstack - is detecting stack overflow possible?, Geoff Clare, 10:28
Re: sigaction and sigaltstack - is detecting stack overflow possible?, Eric Blake, 04:08
Re: rationale for obsoleting _setjmp, Eric Blake, 04:04

July 16, 2008

Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Wojtek Lerch, 20:08
RE: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Daniel Eischen, 14:56
RE: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Alexander Terekhov, 11:29
Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Geoff Clare, 10:24
RE: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Schwarz, Konrad (CT), 09:40
RE: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), David Schwartz, 09:20
Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Wojtek Lerch, 07:24
RE: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), David Schwartz, 06:04
Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Wojtek Lerch, 05:49
RE: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), David Schwartz, 04:42
RE: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), David Schwartz, 04:35
Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Wojtek Lerch, 04:07
RE: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Daniel Eischen, 03:14
RE: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), David Schwartz, 02:57

July 15, 2008

RE: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Daniel Eischen, 23:42
RE: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), David Schwartz, 23:13
Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Ted Baker, 18:07
Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Daniel Eischen, 17:20
Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Alexander Terekhov, 17:03
Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Geoff Clare, 09:50

July 14, 2008

Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Alexander Terekhov, 18:50
Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Wojtek Lerch, 17:15
Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Geoff Clare, 16:50
Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Alexander Terekhov, 12:23
Re: Defect in XSH pthread_cond_timedwait() <-> pthread_cond_signal(), Geoff Clare, 09:53

July 10, 2008

Re: meaning of "the process is blocking [a specific signal]", Geoff Clare, 10:56

July 09, 2008

Re: meaning of "the process is blocking [a specific signal]", Roland McGrath, 20:21
Re: meaning of "the process is blocking [a specific signal]", Ted Baker, 15:23
Re: meaning of "the process is blocking [a specific signal]", David Butenhof, 13:32

July 07, 2008

Re: meaning of "the process is blocking [a specific signal]", Roland McGrath, 10:41
Re: meaning of "the process is blocking [a specific signal]", Geoff Clare, 10:16
Re: Other standards with names encroaching on POSIX reserved symbols, Stephen Michell, 02:40

July 06, 2008

Re: Other standards with names encroaching on POSIX reserved symbols, Martin Sebor, 23:50
meaning of "the process is blocking [a specific signal]", Philip Guenther, 08:58

July 04, 2008

Re: Other standards with names encroaching on POSIX reserved symbols, Geoff Clare, 10:00

July 03, 2008

Other standards with names encroaching on POSIX reserved symbols, Nick Stoughton, 18:25

July 01, 2008

Re: Defect in XCU time, Don Cragun, 22:49

June 30, 2008

Re: Re: Re: Operators in 1003.1, Rocky Bernstein, 21:19
Re: Re: Re: Operators in 1003.1, David Korn, 20:56
Re: Re: Operators in 1003.1, Rocky Bernstein, 15:47
Re: Re: Operators in 1003.1, David Korn, 15:01
Re: Operators in 1003.1, Rocky Bernstein, 13:34
RE: Operators in 1003.1, Schwarz, Konrad (CT), 13:09
Re: Operators in 1003.1, Rocky Bernstein, 11:39
Re: Bug in XSHd5.1 wait, Clive D.W. Feather, 09:11
RE: Operators in 1003.1, Schwarz, Konrad (CT), 09:11

June 29, 2008

typo in XSHd5.1 getcwd, Jim Meyering, 07:22

June 28, 2008

Operators in 1003.1, Rocky Bernstein, 05:28

June 27, 2008

Diff marked draft d5.1r versus 2004 edition available, Andrew Josey, 12:24
Minutes of the June 26 2008 teleconference, Andrew Josey, 12:00

June 26, 2008

Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Austin Interps 211, David Korn, 21:23
Re: Re: Re: RE: Austin Interps 211, David Korn, 13:52
Re: Re: RE: Austin Interps 211, Ted Baker, 13:08
Re: Re: RE: Austin Interps 211, Roger Marquis, 04:49

June 25, 2008

Re: Re: RE: Austin Interps 211, David Korn, 14:39
RE: Austin Interps 211, Roger Marquis, 03:29

June 24, 2008

Re: Austin Interps 211, Chet Ramey, 20:27
RE: Austin Interps 211, Glenn Fowler, 19:08
RE: Austin Interps 211, Roger Marquis, 18:51
Re: Re: Austin Interps 211, David Korn, 16:40
Re: Participants list for review, David Korn, 16:17
Participants list for review, Andrew Josey, 10:19
RE: Austin Interps 211, Schwarz, Konrad (CT), 08:21

June 23, 2008

Re: shell, arithmetic expansion and integer constants, Chet Ramey, 21:34
Re: Re: Austin Interps 211, David Korn, 20:59
Re: Austin Interps 211, Roger Marquis, 20:11
Re: Austin Interps 211, Glenn Fowler, 19:39
Re: scanf and ERANGE, Don Cragun, 19:07
Re: Austin Interps 211, Glenn Fowler, 19:07
Re: Austin Interps 211, Roger Marquis, 18:29
Re: scanf and ERANGE, Micah Cowan, 18:05
Re: scanf and ERANGE, Nick Stoughton, 17:36
Event [Reminder: Austin Group teleconference] updated, Andrew Josey, 06:55

June 20, 2008

scanf and ERANGE, Stephane Chazelas, 16:49

June 19, 2008

Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 03:23

June 18, 2008

Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Eric Blake, 03:57

June 17, 2008

Re: Austin Interps 211, David Korn, 19:19
Re: shell, arithmetic expansion and integer constants, Vincent Lefevre, 17:14
Re: shell, arithmetic expansion and integer constants, Stephane Chazelas, 17:12
Re: shell, arithmetic expansion and integer constants, Roger Marquis, 16:58
Re: shell, arithmetic expansion and integer constants, Stephane Chazelas, 16:27
Re: shell, arithmetic expansion and integer constants, Geoff Clare, 16:24
Re: alphabetic ordering, Bruce Korb, 16:19
Re: shell, arithmetic expansion and integer constants, David Korn, 16:13
Re: shell, arithmetic expansion and integer constants, Roger Marquis, 15:55
shell, arithmetic expansion and integer constants, Vincent Lefevre, 15:07

June 10, 2008

Re: wait* status definition, Geoff Clare, 15:45
Re: wait* status definition, Ulrich Drepper, 15:18
Re: [Fwd: Re: whether ext() and atexit() are safe w.r.t each other, Ulrich Drepper, 15:14
Re: [Fwd: Re: whether ext() and atexit() are safe w.r.t each other, David Butenhof, 11:07
Re: wait* status definition, Geoff Clare, 10:01
Re: [Fwd: Re: whether ext() and atexit() are safe w.r.t each other, Anoop, 09:28
wait* status definition, wollman+austin-group, 07:32
Re: wait* status definition, Michael Kerrisk, 06:02
wait* status definition, Ulrich Drepper, 04:21

June 09, 2008

Re: [Fwd: Re: whether ext() and atexit() are safe w.r.t each other, Nick Stoughton, 13:35
Re: [Fwd: Re: whether ext() and atexit() are safe w.r.t each other, David Butenhof, 13:32