Mail Index

November 20, 2003

Re: flags and bits, Wojtek Lerch, 15:33

November 19, 2003

Re: flags and bits, Jarkko.Hietaniemi, 19:00
Call Reminder: Nov 20, Andrew Josey, 17:25
Re: Defect in XBD 4.11, Geoff Clare, 16:55
RE: Defect in XBD 4.11, Donn Terry, 16:01
Re: Defect in XBD 4.11, Geoff Clare, 15:37
flags and bits, Clive D.W. Feather, 14:53
Re: Defect in XBD 4.11, Geoff Clare, 10:44
PCTS 2003 test suites available, Andrew Josey, 10:16
Availability of TC2 Draft 6 (proposed final text), Andrew Josey, 06:58
RE: Defect in XBD 4.11, Bruce Evans, 03:12
RE: Defect in XBD 4.11, Josh Knight, 00:37
RE: Defect in XBD 4.11, dwc, 00:19

November 18, 2003

RE: Defect in XBD 4.11, Donn Terry, 21:02

November 17, 2003

TC2 Draft 5.1, Andrew Josey, 12:37
Re: Defect in XBD 4.11, Geoff Clare, 12:07

November 15, 2003

Defect in getgrnam_r, Andries.Brouwer, 14:53

November 14, 2003

Re: question on pax gname ext header, Nick Stoughton, 19:41
question on pax gname ext header, Marc Stephenson, 18:31
RE: Proposed Interpretation AI-016, Donn Terry, 16:39
Re: Proposed Interpretation AI-016, Geoff Clare, 16:18
Proposed Interpretation AI-016 30 day comment period, Andrew Josey, 11:35
Document [Austin-016 Proposed Resolution] created/updated, Andrew Josey, 10:47
Minutes of the November 13 Teleconference, Andrew Josey, 09:43
Rdvk Summary Report for TC2 d5, Andrew Josey, 09:09

November 12, 2003

RE: Defect in XBD 4.11, Donn Terry, 17:02
Re: Defect in XBD 4.11, Geoff Clare, 14:44
Proposed Dispositions for TC2d5 rdvk, Andrew Josey, 06:18
Call reminder: Nov 13, Andrew Josey, 06:11
RE: Defect in XBD 4.11, dwc, 06:09

November 10, 2003

Final rdvk for TC2d5, Andrew Josey, 09:17

November 07, 2003

Minutes of the Nov 6 Teleconference, Andrew Josey, 11:23

November 06, 2003

Rdvk reports updated from todays call, Andrew Josey, 16:46

November 05, 2003

Call reminder: Nov 6, Andrew Josey, 17:22
Re: Defect in XBD limits.h, Garrett Wollman, 16:52
Re: Defect in XBD limits.h, Don Cragun, 16:34
Re: Defect in XBD limits.h, Geoff Clare, 09:39
RE: Defect in XBD limits.h, dwc, 07:13

November 04, 2003

Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Larry Dwyer, 22:06
News item created/updated, Andrew Josey, 16:47
ANN: New UNIX Internationalization Guide Book, Andrew Josey, 16:37
The IEEE and The Open Group Launch POSIX(R) Certification Program, Andrew Josey, 15:22

November 03, 2003

Rdvk reports updated, Andrew Josey, 15:38
Re: fork() inside a thread, Mark Brown, 15:30
Reminder: closing of TC2 D5 ballot period, Andrew Josey, 15:16

October 31, 2003

Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Don Cragun, 16:50
Updated PCD Template, Andrew Josey, 15:02
Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Joerg Schilling, 10:25
Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Joerg Schilling, 10:24
Re: System(...) cannot be made thread safe., wojtek, 03:32

October 30, 2003

Re: System(...) cannot be made thread safe., Larry Dwyer, 16:39
Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Geoff Clare, 10:47
fork() inside a thread, Kamal R Prasad, 05:49
RE: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, wojtek, 02:02

October 29, 2003

RE: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Don Cragun, 23:17
System(...) cannot be made thread safe., Larry Dwyer, 21:19
RE: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Seeds, Glen, 19:29
Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Wojtek Lerch, 18:51
RE: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Donn Terry, 18:24
Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, s lurndal, 18:13
Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Don Cragun, 17:27
Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Garrett Wollman, 17:07
Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Geoff Clare, 16:49
Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Don Cragun, 16:38
Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Geoff Clare, 16:18

October 28, 2003

Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Larry Dwyer, 18:17
Re: Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Don Cragun, 16:36

October 27, 2003

Interaction between system(...) and SIG_IGN -->SIGCHLD, Larry Dwyer, 19:02

October 26, 2003

Re: XSH ERN 12 (was: Minutes of the Oct 23 Teleconference), Geoff Clare, 13:00

October 25, 2003

error in send() text, Andries.Brouwer, 20:01
Capturing the entirety of discussions, Alexander Terekhov, 14:22

October 24, 2003

Re: XSH ERN 12 (was: Minutes of the Oct 23 Teleconference), Don Cragun, 17:52
XSH ERN 12 (was: Minutes of the Oct 23 Teleconference), Geoff Clare, 12:40
Minutes of the Oct 23 Teleconference, Andrew Josey, 10:40

October 22, 2003

Call reminder: Oct 23, Andrew Josey, 15:57

October 21, 2003

PAX Xhdr question., Joerg Schilling, 22:16
Re: Minutes of the Oct 16 2003 Teleconference, Geoff Clare, 17:03
Re: Minutes of the Oct 16 2003 Teleconference, Don Cragun, 16:36

October 17, 2003

Re: Minutes of the Oct 16 2003 Teleconference, Geoff Clare, 12:40
Minutes of the Oct 16 2003 Teleconference, Andrew Josey, 11:54

October 16, 2003

Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 14:18
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Dave Butenhof, 13:23
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 12:12
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Clive D.W. Feather, 11:29
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Clive D.W. Feather, 11:24
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 10:01
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 09:20

October 15, 2003

Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 10:06

October 14, 2003

Re: The confusion over "may fail", William King, 19:19
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 19:07
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Dave Butenhof, 18:30
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Dave Butenhof, 18:17
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Dave Butenhof, 18:14
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 17:06
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Joerg Schilling, 16:57
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Harti Brandt, 16:51
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 16:49
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Joerg Schilling, 16:46
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Dave Butenhof, 16:35
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Dave Butenhof, 16:23
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 16:13
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Harti Brandt, 15:53
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Dave Butenhof, 14:59
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 14:47
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Harti Brandt, 14:31
Re: The confusion over "may fail", William King, 14:14
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 13:48
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 13:21
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Harti Brandt, 13:15
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Harti Brandt, 13:07
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 13:05
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 12:49
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Harti Brandt, 12:47
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 12:29
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Dave Butenhof, 12:17
Rdvk reports updated, Andrew Josey, 12:06
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Geoff Clare, 11:37
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Alexander Terekhov, 11:34
Call reminder: Oct 16, Andrew Josey, 10:56
Re: The confusion over "may fail", Harti Brandt, 10:47