| To: | yyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bug in XSHd4 clock_nanosleep |
| From: | Andrew Josey <yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Aug 2000 01:43:54 +0100 |
| References: | <200008160029.BAA27223@xoneweb.opengroup.org> |
The reason its not marked REALTIME is that its not
part of the Realtime Option Group, if anything it
needs to be labelled as "Advanced Realtime".
regards
Andrew
On Aug 16, 1:29am in "Bug in XSHd4 clock_n", yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
> Bug report from : Michael Kavanaugh , Oracle/Platform Technologies
>
> @ page 700 line 6845 section clock_nanosleep comment {2}
>
> Problem:
>
> clock_nanosleep() should be labelled as "(REALTIME)"
>
>
> Action:
>
> Add "(REALTIME)" to end of page 700 line 6845
>
>-- End of excerpt from yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: AI 2000-05-010: proposed interface, David Korn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Bug in XSHd4 clock_nanosleep, Frank Prindle |
| Previous by Thread: | AI 2000-05-034: wording for strtod(), Ulrich Drepper |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bug in XSHd4 clock_nanosleep, Frank Prindle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |