| To: | Joerg Schilling <yyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Defect report for the CD "020205_1224" |
| From: | "H. Peter Anvin" <yyy@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 May 2002 12:29:24 -0700 |
| Cc: | yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxx, yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <200205291322.g4TDMaMd002630@burner.fokus.gmd.de> |
Joerg Schilling wrote: That's unfortunate; I wonder what happened there.Well, since ISO9660, Joliet and RockRidge (the latter at least was proposed as an IEEE standard, although I don't know if that happened or not) are all mutually compatible, there is really no reason not to enable all three. Either way, I maintain the previous statement... pure ISO 9660 (level 2, preferrably), Joliet and RockRidge are all interoperable, and it's hardly an issue of space, so please use them all. Interoperability is a Good Thing, regardless of some of the comments in this thread. -hpa |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Defect report for the CD "020205_1224", SHwareSyst |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Defect report for the CD "020205_1224", Duncan, Kurt A. |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Defect report for the CD "020205_1224", Joerg Schilling |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Defect report for the CD "020205_1224", Matt Seitz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |