| To: | Jim Zepeda <yyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: POSIX/Linux |
| From: | Keld Jørn Simonsen <yyyy@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 5 Dec 2003 01:37:43 +0100 |
| Cc: | yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <UTC200312042154.hB4LsRl23799.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl> <3FCFAE73.8060002@mad-scientist.net> |
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 02:00:19PM -0800, Jim Zepeda wrote: > That would also be true of an ISO LSB standard. I doubt that they would > change their policies. The free availability of an ISO LSB standard was one of the issues in SC22 for standardizing LSB. I am quite sure that it will be solved so that an ISO LSB standard would be freely available. The ISO/IEC POSIX standard (latest edition) is available free of charge on the net via The Open Group. Best regards keld > However, it may be possible to have an arrangement like the one with The > Open Group has with Posix and the Unix specification. > > Are you aware of any arrangement that would make the LSB freely > distributable and not copyrighted? > > Jim > > yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxx wrote: > > >The POSIX standard has the very large disadvantage > >that it is copyrighted and cannot be distributed. > >A variation on the POSIX theme that is freely distributable > >would be a big step forward. > > > >Andries > > > >Copyright ? 2001 The IEEE and The Open Group, All Rights Reserved > > > > > > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: POSIX/Linux, Lois Goldthwaite |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: POSIX/Linux, Andries.Brouwer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: POSIX/Linux, Jim Zepeda |
| Next by Thread: | Re: POSIX/Linux, Rich Teer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |