Re: POSIX vs. LSB

To:	yyyy@xxxxxxxxxx, yyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: POSIX vs. LSB
From:	Joerg Schilling <yyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:50:10 +0100 (CET)
Cc:	yyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

>From: Nick Stoughton <yyyy@xxxxxxxxxx>

>There is a difference though ... the System V ABI allows for application
>portability across different flavors of an implementation of System V on
>the same hardware, the LSB is for Linux (which is not exactly equal to
>System V!).

And as LSB incontrary to SVr4 does not standardize in system specific numerical
uid/gid values, it is not even possible to mount binaries from a different
LSB based Linux distribution.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:yyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       yy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx               (uni)  If you don't have iso-8859-1
       yyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
 URL:  http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/usr/schilling 
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: POSIX vs. LSB, (continued) Re: POSIX vs. LSB, H. Peter Anvin Re: POSIX vs. LSB, Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando Re: POSIX vs. LSB, Jim Zepeda Re: POSIX vs. LSB, Lois Goldthwaite Re: POSIX vs. LSB, Jim Zepeda Re: POSIX vs. LSB, H. Peter Anvin RE: POSIX vs. LSB, Barned, Robert Re: POSIX vs. LSB, Andrew Josey Re: POSIX vs. LSB, Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando Re: POSIX vs. LSB, Keld Jørn Simonsen Re: POSIX vs. LSB, Joerg Schilling <=

Previous by Date:	unlink EPERM/EISDIR (was: POSIX/Linux), Geoff Clare
Next by Date:	Minutes from the December 4 Teleconference, Andrew Josey
Previous by Thread:	Re: POSIX vs. LSB, Keld Jørn Simonsen
Next by Thread:	Reminder: Special Teleconference: Pathname Resolution, Andrew Josey
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [All Lists]