| To: | yyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Defect in XCU ls |
| From: | Glenn Fowler <yyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:37:15 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | AT&T Labs Research |
| References: | <Pine.BSI.3.91.1050116213150.18269A-100000@spsystems.net> <200501170301.WAA18569@raptor.research.att.com> <41ec576c.kBKeoyxLtOSuw4OI%Gunnar.Ritter@pluto.uni-freiburg.de> <200501180207.j0I27nL7006549@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> |
how would vis(1) differentiate between an embedded newline vs the line terminator in the ls output? On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:07:49 -0500 (EST) Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 01:25:16 +0100, Gunnar Ritter ><yyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > A -b option has been present in ls since at least SVR2. It does not > > help much since it is nearly impossible to process the output using > > shell and utilities, though. > The vis(1)/unvis(1) utilities from 4.4BSD would help with that > problem. > -GAWollman |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Defect in XCU ls, Garrett Wollman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Defect in XCU ls, Henry Spencer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Defect in XCU ls, Garrett Wollman |
| Next by Thread: | Newlines in filenames (was: Defect in XCU ls), Geoff Clare |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |