RE: Defect in XBD pthread.h

To:	yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	RE: Defect in XBD pthread.h
From:	Schwarz Konrad <yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:48:35 +0100
Cc:	yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Could the reason for this be that changing headers to use restrict was
stopped pending resolution of an issue with C9X restrict? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loic Domaigne [mailto:yyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 4:13 PM
> To: yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Defect in XBD pthread.h
> 
> 
> > pthread_mutex_timedlock() prototype is missing 'restrict' keyword.
> 
> Nice catch! 
> 
> Loic. 
> 
> --
> SMS bei wichtigen e-mails und Ihre Gedanken sind frei ...
> Alle Infos zur SMS-Benachrichtigung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/sms
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Defect in XBD pthread.h, Loic Domaigne RE: Defect in XBD pthread.h, Schwarz Konrad <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Defect in XCU pax, Glenn Fowler
Next by Date:	link(2) and symlinks, Eric Blake
Previous by Thread:	Re: Defect in XBD pthread.h, Loic Domaigne
Next by Thread:	link(2) and symlinks, Eric Blake
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [All Lists]