TC3? (was Re: Bug in XSHd5 futimens)

[Andrew Josey <ajosey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There are occasions when an aardvark against the old standard can be
useful, for example when an interpretation is needed for certification
purposes. Since we went down the revision path at IEEE the new standard
supersedes the existing standard once approved so I do not think we are
procedurally allow further TCs.
regards
Andrew

On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 15:35 +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Yes, my meta-question was really something like: is it worth raising 
> Aardvarks against the older standard?  Since I assume there won't be
> a 
> TC3, of the older standard, your answer makes sense.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Michael 
-- 
Andrew Josey                      The Open Group
Austin Group Chair                Thames Tower, 37-45 Station Road,
Email: a.josey@opengroup.org      Reading,Berks.RG1 1LX,England
Tel:   +44 118 9508311 ext 2250   Fax: +44 118 9500110