| To: | austin-group-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, marquis@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Re: Austin Interps 211 |
| From: | David Korn <dgk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:40:33 -0400 |
cc: austin-group-l@opengroup.org Subject: Re: Re: Austin Interps 211 -------- > A meta issue are the stakeholder groups: 1) developers, and 2) end-users, > generally systems administrators. This proposal and others we've seen > recently indicate an imbalance, with the end-users being underrepresented. > > Roger Marquis > Can you provide an example of any existing Bourne shell script that would break because of this change? Why would you use $'...' in a Boure shell script? The user would have written '$...' I choose $'...' rather than extending the rules for "..." to avoid incompatibilities. I have never heard of a single Bourne shell script breaking because of this change. I you beleive that end-users are being underrepresented, then provide an example. David Korn dgk@research.att.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Participants list for review, David Korn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Austin Interps 211, Roger Marquis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Austin Interps 211, David Korn |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: RE: Austin Interps 211, David Korn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |