Re: Minutes of the August 21 2008 teleconference

["Fred J. Tydeman" <tydeman@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:23:22 +0100, Geoff Clare wrote:

>Since C99 does not specify underflow for tgamma(), all of this new
>text should be CX shaded.

I disagree.  C99 does not specify underflow for any function.
C99 does specify range error (which includes both overflow
and underflow) for many math functions (including tgamma and exp).
---
Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
tydeman@xxxxxx      Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (775) 358-9748      Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")
Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.