| To: | austin-group-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Aardvark Bugs 0000113]: Shouldn't we add a Resolution choice of "Withdrawn"? |
| From: | Austin Group Bug Tracker <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:15:15 +0000 |
| Keywords: | [Aardvark Bugs] Aardvark Mk III |
The following issue has been UPDATED. ====================================================================== http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=113 ====================================================================== Reported By: Don Cragun Assigned To: ====================================================================== Project: Aardvark Bugs Issue ID: 113 Category: Aardvark Mk III Type: Enhancement Request Severity: Comment Priority: normal Status: New Name: Don Cragun Organization: Self User Reference: dwc-Withdrawn ====================================================================== Date Submitted: 2009-06-30 22:25 UTC Last Modified: 2009-07-01 15:15 UTC ====================================================================== Summary: Shouldn't we add a Resolution choice of "Withdrawn"? Description: http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=111 was withdrawn by the submitter, but has Resolution "Rejected". Shouldn't we have a "Withdrawn" choice in the Resolution field? Desired Action: Add a Resolution field choice of "Withdrawn". ====================================================================== |
| Previous by Date: | [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000086]: asctime rationale, Austin Group Bug Tracker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Aardvark Bugs 0000113]: Shouldn't we add a Resolution choice of "Withdrawn"?, Austin Group Bug Tracker |
| Previous by Thread: | [Aardvark Bugs 0000113]: Shouldn't we add a Resolution choice of "Withdrawn"?, Austin Group Bug Tracker |
| Next by Thread: | [Aardvark Bugs 0000113]: Shouldn't we add a Resolution choice of "Withdrawn"?, Austin Group Bug Tracker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |