| To: | "Wojtek Lerch" <Wojtek@xxxxxxx>, "Geoff Clare" <gwc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem |
| From: | "Wojtek Lerch" <Wojtek@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:01:40 -0400 |
| Cc: | <austin-group-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <e26e5335cda9d0dfe49395e6115066fe@xxxxxx> <1730938080F74546ACC51CB65BA00565@xxxxxx> <20090702094404.GA28393@xxxxxx> <4A4CC239.2040603@xxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | Acn7IUuStZ3m0lc8QuOYvFi6k/UG1AAAqVog |
| Thread-topic: | [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem |
Also, aren't the requirements about pointers to functions having the same representation as void*, and the conversion not modifying the representation, a huge overkill? Standard C doesn't specify such strong requirements about any other types -- why would POSIX want to go so far beyond what's really required for dlsym()? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Invalid shell assignments in environment, Giacomo A. Catenazzi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem, Wojtek Lerch |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem, Wojtek Lerch |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem, Wojtek Lerch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |