| To: | wollman+austin-group@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Invalid shell assignments in environment |
| From: | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:15:19 -0400 |
| Cc: | chet.ramey@xxxxxxxx, austin-group-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, chet@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Read-receipt-to: | chet.ramey@xxxxxx |
| References: | <200907012242.n61MgCCp020103@xxxxxx> <4A4C2005.6030402@xxxxxx> <4a4c81a6.2tWl4Z9DpJUyvd+z%Joerg.Schilling@xxxxxx> <200907021327.n62DRe5k029384@xxxxxx> <20090702143325.GA5491@xxxxxx> <4A4CCA35.6070009@xxxxxx> <4A4CCBE1.7020801@xxxxxx> <20090702150847.GA6190@xxxxxx> <090702183047.AA87319.SM@xxxxxx> <4858.76.191.129.144.1246561262.squirrel@xxxxxx> <20090702202320.58C5B2B208F@mx5.roble.com> <090702205546.AA88203.SM@xxxxxx> <19021.8209.688447.802227@xxxxxx> |
> <<On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:55:46 -0400, Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@xxxxxx> said: > > >> One question though, are we talking about a portable character set for > >> variable names, variable values, or both? Don't know if there's a need to > >> ensure the portability of values but I see a substantial value in > >> standardizing the character set for variable names, to ASCII ideally. > > > Variable names. > > Hmmm. In what character set is the value of the LANG and LC_* > environment variables? From my perspective, it doesn't matter. Values aren't restricted in general, and as a practical matter, it's whatever setlocale() accepts. Chet -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@xxxxxx http://tiswww.tis.case.edu/~chet/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem, Wojtek Lerch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Invalid shell assignments in environment, Chet Ramey |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Invalid shell assignments in environment, wollman+austin-group |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Invalid shell assignments in environment, Chet Ramey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |