| To: | "Schwarz, Konrad" <konrad.schwarz@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem |
| From: | wollman+austin-group@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:33:04 -0400 |
| Cc: | <austin-group-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <e26e5335cda9d0dfe49395e6115066fe@xxxxxx><1730938080F74546ACC51CB65BA00565@xxxxxx><20090702094404.GA28393@xxxxxx><4A4CC239.2040603@xxxxxx><5030E566C603DA449D6B4C060CE529B73A8F37@MCHP7RDA.ww002.siemens.net><4A4D2366.9090904@xxxxxx><5030E566C603DA449D6B4C060CE529B73A8FF1@MCHP7RDA.ww002.siemens.net> |
<<On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:55:25 +0200, "Schwarz, Konrad" <konrad.schwarz@xxxxxx> said: > In the C standard, paragraph 1 states that the conversions void * to > other object/incomplete type are allowed, paragraph 7 states what > happens [...more excellent standards-lawyering deleted...] After all this, wouldn't it simply be easier to define a new dlfunc() interface? There is prior art. -GAWollman |
| Previous by Date: | [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000096]: posix_openpt() and grantpt(), Austin Group Bug Tracker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem, wollman+austin-group |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem, Wojtek Lerch |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem, wollman+austin-group |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |