| To: | austin-group-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem |
| From: | Geoff Clare <gwc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:10:05 +0100 |
| References: | <e26e5335cda9d0dfe49395e6115066fe@austingroupbugs.net> <1730938080F74546ACC51CB65BA00565@ott.qnx.com> <20090702094404.GA28393@squonk.masqnet> <4A4CC239.2040603@qnx.com> <5030E566C603DA449D6B4C060CE529B73A8F37@MCHP7RDA.ww002.siemens.net> <4A4D2366.9090904@qnx.com> <5030E566C603DA449D6B4C060CE529B73A8FF1@MCHP7RDA.ww002.siemens.net> <19022.23792.699537.351052@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> |
wollman+austin-group@lcs.mit.edu wrote, on 03 Jul 2009: > > After all this, wouldn't it simply be easier to define a new dlfunc() > interface? There is prior art. That's something we could (re)consider for the next revision, but we can't add new interfaces in a TC. For the TC we need to fix the text in XSH 2.12.3. -- Geoff Clare <g.clare@opengroup.org> The Open Group, Thames Tower, Station Road, Reading, RG1 1LX, England |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem, Geoff Clare |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem, Geoff Clare |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem, Geoff Clare |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000074]: Pointer Types Problem, Geoff Clare |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |