Email List: Xaustin-group-lX
[All Lists]

Re: c99 -I option and GCC

To: austin-group-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: c99 -I option and GCC
From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent-opgr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 02:38:19 +0200
Mail-followup-to: austin-group-l@opengroup.org
References: <4a76fb43.lbC4QjMxLz0GOnAz%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de><200908031526.n73FQ0M7002876@aragorn.savarese.org>
On 2009-08-03 11:26:00 -0400, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
> Are there any additional compiler options that should be included in
> a defect report?

Here are my comments concerning the other c99 options:

What's the behavior if one gives several -D options with the same name
and different values (and no corresponding -U option)?

  -O  optlevel
    Specify the level of code optimization. If the optlevel
    option-argument is the digit '0' , all special code optimizations
    shall be disabled. [...]

"all special code optimizations shall be disabled" is quite ambiguous,
in particular because optimizations are not clearly defined. Also,
what's "special"?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>