| To: | austin-group-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: c99 -I option and GCC |
| From: | Vincent Lefevre <vincent-opgr@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:56:38 +0200 |
| Mail-followup-to: | austin-group-l@opengroup.org |
| References: | <20090731094755.GA22936@squonk.masqnet><MJBBLAAECCIFDIELHMCJIEOKIDAD.davids@webmaster.com><20090802170440.GO1799@prunille.vinc17.org><4a75df96.77nZTAS4pr04C+NK%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> |
On 2009-08-02 20:48:54 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > From your problem description, it seems as the cause for your > problems is the fact that some people install private include files > into a directory that is claimed to be a "system include dir" by the > vendor. No, the problem is that system include directories cannot be reordered by GCC. > If this is true, how could this mailing list help? POSIX allows *any* include directories to be reordered, thanks to the -I option. But this is not taken into account by GCC and in a comment of my bug report, it has been said that the defect is in POSIX. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre |
| Next by Thread: | Re: c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |