c99 -I option and GCC

To:	austin-group-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	c99 -I option and GCC
From:	Vincent Lefevre <vincent-opgr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:04:03 +0200
Mail-followup-to:	austin-group-l@opengroup.org

Hi,

Some time ago, I submitted the following bug report about the GCC
behavior concerning the -I option, as this leads to non-conforming
c99 utilities provided by some vendors (e.g. Debian).

  http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40442

I got a reply (see comment #1) saying that this "sounds like it is
mainly a defect in POSIX".

Any comment?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
c99 -I option and GCC, (continued) c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre <= c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre Re: c99 -I option and GCC, Geoff Clare RE: c99 -I option and GCC, David Schwartz RE: c99 -I option and GCC, David Schwartz RE: c99 -I option and GCC, David Schwartz RE: c99 -I option and GCC, David Schwartz RE: c99 -I option and GCC, David Schwartz

Previous by Date:	c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre
Next by Date:	c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre
Previous by Thread:	c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre
Next by Thread:	c99 -I option and GCC, Vincent Lefevre
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [All Lists]