Email List: Xaustin-group-lX
[All Lists]

c99 -O option

To: austin-group-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: c99 -O option
From: David-Sarah Hopwood <david-sarah@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 05:49:26 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7XjErdRr2CTnmiUX9s1+brZpMjquswyVqss6alJz1dE=; b=usyRjQ30z+3gI52d20zY5T0FHakfwjzlhC+nwXeqm7eWA1Fuyv9PKnJfcIKh4HZRd+ ZTXPan4zJo1XaOj76AAZXo2tStMcTU4eJh0V0B7nbh/bNhrAkOVrT79VGZuiSaQuqSKV ec5ci8Y8Y6gpwEBDSur9apqU66ZZFMzHlVUUo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XEfgAxBHNQfuLi8UAHvR1fkjA/4ZITrzGuAMwwcbs6klxHJHfcGeJPuqIzlIu7HoVa pTrIY5wGE1VMLGqZJW/PPHH0AlEG9Vc6RnYz/3sg0ZckbustdwqOpj7Mj884E/L+AqMf 73DLXwoYRyE2lppe116RuEf43MNHQa1lvPTWM=
References: <4a76fb43.lbC4QjMxLz0GOnAz%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <200908031526.n73FQ0M7002876@aragorn.savarese.org> <20090804003819.GE3746@prunille.vinc17.org> <1249347040.2853.6.camel@physicslaptop.localdomain>
Hal Finkel wrote:
> Vincent,
> 
> I agree that the description of -O0 is ambiguous. It might be more
> accurate to say something like:
> 
> If the optlevel option-argument is the digit '0', c99 shall operate in a
> mode which minimizes its own runtime.

That's an overspecification. I suggest:

  -O optlevel
    Specify the level of code optimization. optlevel is a decimal digit
    such that higher digits generally correspond to a greater degree of
    optimization, and the lowest degree of optimization that can be
    specified is denoted by the digit '0'.

-- 
David-Sarah Hopwood  ⚥  http://davidsarah.livejournal.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>