| To: | shwaresyst@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000177]: mismatch between example descriptionand code |
| From: | wollman+austin-group@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:39:28 -0500 |
| Cc: | gwc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, austin-group-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <ee3ffd5cb61c11046aea665c63c5adbd@austingroupbugs.net><8CC2B9DD22E07E8-AF4-14C01@webmail-m088.sysops.aol.com><20091105102458.GA11253@squonk.masqnet><8CC2C4B8D552A03-2DFC-9667@webmail-m095.sysops.aol.com> |
<<On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:24:15 -0500, shwaresyst@aol.com said:
> /* get implementation instance's max expectable line length and
> account for fgets() appending a NULL char */
> line_max = sysconf(_SC_LINE_MAX) + 1;
If the implementation defines {LINE_MAX} to be {LONG_MAX}, this will
overflow. (I could see some implementors wanting to do that, in lieu
of saying "unlimited".)
-GAWollman
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000177]: mismatch between example descriptionand code, wollman+austin-group |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000177]: mismatch between example descriptionand code, wollman+austin-group |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000177]: mismatch between example descriptionand code, wollman+austin-group |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000177]: mismatch between example descriptionand code, wollman+austin-group |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |