[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000156]: df -k and free inodes

[Austin Group Bug Tracker <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=156 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                geoffclare
Assigned To:                ajosey
====================================================================== 
Project:                    1003.1(2008)/Issue 7
Issue ID:                   156
Category:                   Shell and Utilities
Type:                       Error
Severity:                   Objection
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     Interpretation Required
Name:                       Geoff Clare 
Organization:               The Open Group 
User Reference:              
Section:                    df 
Page Number:                2595 
Line Number:                83575 
Interp Status:              Proposed 
Final Accepted Text:        http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=156#c289 
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-09-22 15:31 UTC
Last Modified:              2009-11-11 09:40 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    df -k and free inodes
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0000296) geoffclare (manager) - 2009-11-11 09:40
 http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=156#c296 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
(Response to http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=156#c292)

Currently the only standard way to find out the number of free
inodes is to use df without -P or -k.  If we remove the requirement
for df to output the number of free inodes when invoked this way,
we would have to add a -i option so that there is still a way to
obtain this information.  We cannot add an option in a TC; it would
have to wait for the next revision.  Therefore I don't believe we
can consider making such a change in this interpretation (because we
need to fix the -k problem in TC1, but can't add -i).  However, we
could certainly consider it for the next revision.  If you would
like to set the ball rolling on that, please submit a new aardvark
with the type field set to "Enhancement Request". 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-09-22 15:31 geoffclare     New Issue                                    
2009-09-22 15:31 geoffclare     Status                   New => Under Review 
2009-09-22 15:31 geoffclare     Assigned To               => ajosey          
2009-09-22 15:31 geoffclare     Name                      => Geoff Clare     
2009-09-22 15:31 geoffclare     Organization              => The Open Group  
2009-09-22 15:31 geoffclare     Section                   => df              
2009-09-22 15:31 geoffclare     Page Number               => 2595            
2009-09-22 15:31 geoffclare     Line Number               => 83575           
2009-09-22 15:31 geoffclare     Interp Status             => ---             
2009-09-24 16:09 msbrown        Status                   Under Review =>
Resolved
2009-09-24 16:09 msbrown        Resolution               Open => Accepted    
2009-09-24 16:17 msbrown        Interp Status            --- => Pending      
2009-09-24 16:17 msbrown        Note Added: 0000241                          
2009-09-24 16:17 msbrown        Status                   Resolved =>
Interpretation Required
2009-11-07 07:24 ajosey         Note Added: 0000289                          
2009-11-07 07:25 ajosey         Interp Status            Pending => Proposed 
2009-11-07 07:25 ajosey         Final Accepted Text       =>
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=156#c289     
2009-11-08 17:13 Roger Marquis  Note Added: 0000292                          
2009-11-11 09:40 geoffclare     Note Added: 0000296                          
======================================================================