Email List: Xaustin-group-lX
[All Lists]

Re: Teleconference Minutes from 16th December 1999

To: Keld Jørn Simonsen <yyyy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Teleconference Minutes from 16th December 1999
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <yyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 18:27:09 -0800
Cc: Nick Stoughton <yyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Andrew Josey'" <yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'yyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <yyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Transmeta Corporation
References: <C17565313440D211A2E80008C724AC0D01ACC71E@bel-exchange.isrworld.com> <19991218024357.A1928@light.dkuug.dk>
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> 
> > On your second question you have a good point, though the "#!" stuff is not
> > a part of the spec. Therefore, a perl script (or any other script) is not a
> > portable utility and is therefore out of scope; by this definition they are
> > not utilities. There is no mechanism in the standard to support any type of
> > utility that is not either a binary or shell script.
> 
> Everybody supports #! - why not standardize it?
> 

This was my fault -- I was going to write a standardizable spec and
dropped the ball on it.  Real life caught up with me, unfortunately. 
I'll try to get it done.

        -hpa

-- 
<yyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> at work, <yyy@xxxxxxxxx> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>