| To: | "H. Peter Anvin" <yyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Teleconference Minutes from 16th December 1999 |
| From: | Dan Kegel <yyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Dec 1999 08:53:04 -0800 |
| Cc: | Joerg Schilling <yyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, yyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Precious Little |
| References: | <199912180948.KAA14579@fokus.gmd.de> <385BB789.37A385BD@transmeta.com> |
"H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > > It may be a good idea to standardize paths for interpreters. > > This seems to be a good idea because more and more Linux guys > > are putting #!/bin/bash into shell scripts. > > > > Sot there should be an aggreement about which interpreters > > may be used at all (because they are part of a standard system) > > and where they need to be located. > > Another option is to leave it to the system installers' disgression; if > so it should be coded that the string specified in the #! should be the > one returned by the "which" command. That wouldn't yield cross-platform portability of scripts, which one assumes is the goal. [Ignore the following if it's wrong; I don't know the standards] At the least, the standard might want to mandate that /bin/sh be available on all systems, that if perl is available on the system, it be available as /bin/perl (perhaps as a symbolic link), and that the #! trick work. If you do standardize the #! trick, suid script issues need to be considered. - Dan -- (The above is just my personal opinion; I don't speak for my employer, except on the occasional talk show.) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Teleconference Minutes from 16th December 1999, H. Peter Anvin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Teleconference Minutes from 16th December 1999, Andries.Brouwer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Teleconference Minutes from 16th December 1999, H. Peter Anvin |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Teleconference Minutes from 16th December 1999, Andries.Brouwer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |