| To: | Eric Vought <yyyyyyy@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: BUG in XBDd5 (preserve integral types) |
| From: | "Clive D.W. Feather" <yyyyy@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:34:54 +0000 |
| Cc: | Ulrich Drepper <yyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ted Baker <yyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, yyy@xxxxxxxxxxx, yyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <m3itnnuvul.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101101740490.18237-100000@diablo.qlue-lan> |
Eric Vought said: > What happens if I (and others) rewrite all of > our code to the assumption that size_t is <= long long, essentially by > using "long long" everywhere, and the next standard introduces "really > long" or "outrageously long". You don't; you write to the types [u]intmax_t. However, that requires a transition period. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <yyyyy@xxxxxxxxx> | Tel: +44 20 8371 1138 Internet Expert | Home: <yyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx> | Fax: +44 20 8371 1037 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | DFax: +44 20 8371 4037 Thus plc | | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 |
| Previous by Date: | Re: BUG in XBDd5 (preserve integral types), Antoine Leca |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: BUG in XBDd5 (preserve integral types), Clive D.W. Feather |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: BUG in XBDd5 (preserve integral types), Antoine Leca |
| Next by Thread: | Re: BUG in XBDd5 (preserve integral types), Eric Vought |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |