| To: | "'Marc Aurele La France'" <yyy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Re: set -e and SIGCHLD |
| From: | Bruce Korb <yyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:45:29 -0800 |
Thank you Marc, > To my way of thinking, the solution is clear: have conforming exec() > implementations >always< reset SIGC[H]LD dispositions to SIG_DFL, and > SA_NOCLDWAIT to zero. This is the only technically sound solution. One other option tho: an environment variable a la LD_RUN_PATH et al.: export INHERIT_SIGCHLD_IGNORE=true for anyone that really, really wants this incomprehensible functionality. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Comments on XBDd5 ERN 322, Paul Eggert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Comments on XBDd5 ERN 322, Donn Terry |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: set -e and SIGCHLD, schilling |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RE: Re: set -e and SIGCHLD, David Korn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |