| To: | yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxx, yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: RE: RE: Re: set -e and SIGCHLD |
| From: | yyyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2001 00:59:32 +0100 (MET) |
From: Bruce Korb <yyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
For signal disposition, there are three choices:
1. Supply a handling routine. I don't suppose anyone recommends
that child processes call a routine in the parent process, so
that does not pass through, right?
It is perfectly possible to have a handler for SIGCHLD.
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Comments on XBDd5 ERN 322, Andries.Brouwer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: AI 42: atexit() and dlclose(), Ulrich Drepper |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: RE: RE: Re: set -e and SIGCHLD, Bruce Korb |
| Next by Thread: | RE: RE: RE: Re: set -e and SIGCHLD, Marc Aurele La France |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |