| To: | Drazen Kacar <yyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: AI 42: atexit() and dlclose() |
| From: | Ulrich Drepper <yyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 13 Mar 2001 16:10:31 -0800 |
| Cc: | Mark Brown <yyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Austin Group <yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <B6D3DFD4.3655%bmark@us.ibm.com><20010313221943.A23121@washington> |
Drazen Kacar <yyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'd be happier with "Object unloading occurs by a successful invocation > of dlclose()." If dlclose() can't or won't unload object (for any reason), > it doesn't make sense to run atexit handlers anyway. This doesn't work. The registered functions obviously have to be called before you try to unload the object. So, it is the late if the unloading failed (you cannot simply run the constructors again). The original wording is what is intended. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: RE: RE: Re: set -e and SIGCHLD, Andries.Brouwer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: RE: RE: Re: set -e and SIGCHLD, Marc Aurele La France |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: AI 42: atexit() and dlclose(), Drazen Kacar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: AI 42: atexit() and dlclose(), Drazen Kacar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |