| To: | yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Options vs operands |
| From: | Ben Harris <yyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:51:46 +0100 (BST) |
Quick question: Does "-" as an argument to a utility count as an option or an operand (assuming its position makes it clear)? To give a more concrete example, I'd like to know what (if anything) the standard says "split - -b" should do. I feel that it should split stdin into files called "-baa", "-bab", etc, but I can't find anything in the Utility Syntax Guidelines which states this unambiguously. Indeed, I'm not sure I can find anything which defines how implementations are to find the end of the options in the absence of "--" at all. The definition of getopt() seems to agree with my feeling, but it's meant to follow the Guidelines, not define them. -- Ben Harris <yyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx> Portmaster, NetBSD/acorn26 <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/acorn26/> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Did writev() TIN 4U.00003 get resolved in the spec?, Geoff Clare |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Options vs operands, Bruce Korb |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Defect in XSH lio_listio(), Geoff Clare |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Options vs operands, Bruce Korb |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |