| To: | "Michael T Kerrisk" <yyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Stop signals and interruption of system calls on Linux |
| From: | Paul Eggert <yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 14 Feb 2004 20:58:28 -0800 |
| Cc: | "Wojtek Lerch" <yyyyyy@xxxxxxx>, yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <13797.1076756239@www47.gmx.net> |
At Sat, 14 Feb 2004 11:57:19 +0100 (MET), "Michael T Kerrisk" <yyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxx> writes: > I think that saves my argument: Linux should not be returning > EINTR at this point. This topic came up in a POSIX.1 standards meeting on April 22, 1993, and the consensus of that meeting also agreed with you. > (And of course I'm still curious if any other implementation behaves > like Linux.) Long-ago AIX hosts had that bug as well, but they were fixed after that POSIX.1 discussion of a decade ago. For more details about this, please see: David A. Willcox (Motorola MCG - Urbana) Job Control and POSIX <http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1r77ojINN85n%40ftp.UU.NET> 1993-04-22 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: My guess is this bounces, Bruce Korb |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Stop signals and interruption of system calls on Linux, Manfred Spraul |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Stop signals and interruption of system calls on Linux, Michael T Kerrisk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Stop signals and interruption of system calls on Linux, Manfred Spraul |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |