| To: | Schwarz Konrad <yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: XSH/XRAT conflict over cancellation points |
| From: | Alexander Terekhov <yyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 May 2004 13:00:07 +0200 |
| Cc: | "'Dave Butenhof'" <yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxx>, yyyyyyyyyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
> Should that be filed as a defect? The real defect here is that POSIX still doesn't defer to ISO/IEC 14882. Thread cleanup handlers shall be defined semantically equivalent to dismissible C++ "scope guards" of the local scopes formed by pthread_cleanup_push/pop() and thread exit/cancel shall be defined semantically equivalent to unspecified C++ exception (POSIX.C++ profile shall specify them, of course). No brain-damaged volatiles needed. regards, alexander. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XBD ERN 7 -- regcomp and sed, Geoff Clare |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XSH/XRAT conflict over cancellation points, Dave Butenhof |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: XSH/XRAT conflict over cancellation points, Schwarz Konrad |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XSH/XRAT conflict over cancellation points, Dave Butenhof |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [All Lists] |