(Please note that there is no need to cc me separately on Austin
Group email, i am on the reflector too and happy just to get a single
copy of the email:-)
On Mar 9, 5:34pm in "RE: Document [Austin", Seeds, Glen wrote:
> page 123 line 4508 section asctime() objection
> After line 4508, add:
> Otherwise, if any of the fields of the tm structure pointed to
> by timeptr contain values that are outside the normal ranges, the
> behavior of asctime() is *undefined*. If the calculated year
> precedes
> the Epoch or exceeds four digits, the behavior is *undefined*.
>
> This is much more rogue-o-matic enabled than the author of the aardvark
> requested. What's the rationale for leaving it that open?
> /glen
The wording is as finalized in XSHbug2.txt Enhancement Request
Number 24.
This and others are now being circulated for their 30 day
approval process to become approved interpretations as part of the
preparation phase for Draft 1.
Suggestions *with rewording* are required to make a change, if there
is a no consensus on the suggested change then the interpretation would
remain open and the change won't make it to D1.
regards
Andrew
-----
Andrew Josey The Open Group
Austin Group Chair Thames Tower, 37-45 Station Road,
Email: yyyyyyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Reading,Berks.RG1 1LX,England
Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110
|