The Open Group : Making Standards Work
About The Open Group The Open Group Forums Certification Consortia Services
HOME   |   SITE MAP   |   SEARCH  

Sponsor an Event Become a Member of The Open Group The Open Group Member Area
Government Programs Events Bookstore & Downloads Newsroom Contact The Open Group
You are here: Newsroom > Member Newsletters
Member Newsletters


Issue 4, 2005

In This Issue:

FEATURE

NEWS CONFERENCES EVENTS THE WEB OTHER
FEATURES

What's in a Name?
      by Dr. Chris Harding, The Open Group
Have you ever tried to sign up for a web service, and found that the username you picked was already taken? As well as your second, third, and fourth choice? And did this make you pick a new identifier, different from any other one that you have used before? And could you, six months later, remember it?

The difficulty of assigning meaningful identifiers is an annoyance for us as individuals. But for CIOs in major corporations, it’s a big headache. Identity management issues can be responsible for 15-20% of large program development costs. The Yankee Group reckons that the identity management market is growing at over 7% per year and will reach $3.3 billion by 2008 – revenue for vendors; cost for users. And some of this cost is simply down to identifier collision and confusion – it’s real, but unnecessary.

An organization must manage the identities of many people. Unfortunately, each of these people generally ends up with multiple identifiers, because different departments work in different ways, different products use different formats, and different managers make different choices at different times.

The traditional solution was to assign everyone an employee number. But with the rise of the boundaryless organization, and with the need to manage identities of people not only within the organization, but also of people associated with customers, suppliers, and other business partners, this solution does not suffice. And today’s frequent mergers and acquisitions introduce further complexities, making employee numbers potentially as confused as names.

A more modern approach, commonly used for web services, is to identify people by their e-mail addresses. Unfortunately, these are unstable, and change quite often, as people change Internet service providers, or corporations reorganize their mail domains. Despite that, companies need to be able to keep track of their employees’ activities. For example it is critical to be able to document decisions on a large – often multi-million dollar - engineering contract. Companies need to ensure greater stability, or even permanence, of identities.

The difficulties are compounded by the way that software products identify their users. They do not have meaningful, human-friendly identifiers; they have systemic identifiers – strings of letters and numbers that operating systems assign that are convenient for machine processing but have no other meaning. Unfortunately, a user generally ends up with a different identifier on each system and, when a real person needs to be identified, perhaps in the case of a security breach, or when responsibility for a transaction is in question, it can be downright impossible to follow the trail.

Must we accept this situation? Not according to Jim Hosmer, principal architect for enterprise information systems at Lockheed Martin Corporation. Faced with the management of identities in a decentralized conglomerate with 130,000 employees and 65,000 trading partners, he has a deep understanding of the problem. He sees the solution as a single standard for systemic identifiers that will be globally unique, stable, and persistent through organizational changes. It will not replace all existing identifiers, but will provide a common core identifier to which all other identifiers can be mapped. As a single fixed point, it will keep the confusion of multiple, changing, names under control.

Not everyone shares Hosmer’s optimism that the problem can be solved, and the reasons for this are as much political as technical. To achieve its goal, the common standard must be widely adopted by product suppliers. They see the cost of implementation, and the difficulty of success, and are less than enthusiastic. They point out, for example, that other products have tried to implement a stable and persistent presence, but this proved impractical.

Nevertheless, there is a growing need to address the problem. It is becoming more serious, and more costly, as organizations and systems become more complex. Also, the scope is broadening. As computers and software become more ‘intelligent’, and become actors themselves, it is increasingly important to be able to identify them when they play a role in transactions. Justin Taylor, chief strategist for digital identity at Novell, speaks of the need to identify silicon-based, as well as carbon-based, life forms: services, devices, applications, and media, as well as people.

There is pressure from users for action. Three consortia – the Distributed Management Task Force, the Network Applications Consortium, and The Open Group - have approached the core identifier problem from different angles. Now, driven by their customer members, they are working together to resolve it.

The solution may not be difficult or technically complex. Richard Saul Wurman, who coined the term “information architecture”, once remarked that history teaches us that people will struggle with the obvious. It was something like 26 years after the first Gutenberg Bible that somebody invented page numbers – the key to indexing and retrieving information from books. We have become more clever and sophisticated since then, but not necessarily better at finding the simple and straightforward approach.

In January, at The Open Group conference on Architecting Identity Management, Jim Hosmer issued a challenge: to produce an acceptable open standard for core systemic identifiers by the end of 2005. If customers and vendors work together, that might just be possible, and, given the political difficulties, it would be a major achievement. But when it does happen, there is unlikely to be a major fanfare of publicity, even though it will simplify systems management, improve security, and reduce costs. Like page numbering, it will be one of those things that seem so obvious once they are there that no-one can imagine life without them.

For more information, please contact Dr. Chris Harding

Top of Page

NEWS


The Open Group in the Media

The Open Group in the press:

Press Releases:

Top of Page

Certification News
TOGAF Certification News

The total number of TOGAF 8 Certified Professionals reached 315.

Current status of TOGAF Certified products, individuals, services, and tool support:

  • TOGAF 7 Certified - 28 Registered Individuals
  • TOGAF 8 Certified - 315 Registered Individuals

The full register is online at: http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/cert/cert_archlist.tpl

  • TOGAF 7 Training - 2 Registered Products from 1 Company
  • TOGAF 7 Professional Services - 4 Registered Services from 4 Companies
  • TOGAF 8 Training - 4 Registered Products from 2 Companies
  • TOGAF 8 Professional Services - 5 Registered Services from 5 Companies
  • TOGAF 8 Tool Support - 3 Registered Products from 3 Companies

The full register is online at: http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/cert/cert_prodlist.tpl

LSB Certification News
We are pleased to announce that:

  • Linpus Technologies, Inc has registered Linpus 9.3 as conforming to the LSB Runtime Environment for IA32 version 2.0 product standard

To see the Conformance Statement please refer to the latest official list of LSB registered products at: http://www.opengroup.org/lsb/cert/register.html

For more information on the Free Standards Group Certification program, please refer to http://www.freestandards.org/certification/

SIF Certification News
We are pleased to announce that the following products have been registered:

  • Century Consultants - Star_Base 3 and above with ZIAgent 3.2 and above
  • Central Access Corporation - SAM6i 1.0 with ActiveSIF_Agent 0.5
  • aal - eSIS 7.0 and above with eSIS Express SIF Agent 1.x
  • Broome-Tioga BOCES - ClearTrack 200 Complete 1.6x and above with ClearTrack 200 SIF Agent 1.x
  • 4GL School Solutions, Inc. - ENCORE! 6.6 or higher with ENCORE! SIF Agent
  • US Netcom - USNCC SIF Interface 1.0

as conforming to the SIF-enabled Application Product Standard 1.5

To view all current SIF certifications and Conformance Statements, please see the SIF Certification Register at http://www.opengroup.org/sif/cert/register.html

For more information on the SIF certification, please refer to: http://www.opengroup.org/sif/cert

Top of Page

The Open Group establishes a new Forum – UDEF Forum
The Open Group is setting up a new Forum of The Open Group, to be known as the UDEF Forum, to focus on development of a Universal Data Element Framework (UDEF) and implementing a registry for it. The Forum members will work to establish the UDEF as the universally used classification system for data elements. Their activities will include defining the requirements, identifying business models and/or sources of funding to facilitate the development and ongoing costs of the registry, maintaining the UDEF as an open standard, advocating and promoting it, putting in place technical architecture to support it, and setting up educational programs to train information professional in its use.

The role of the UDEF Forum will be to:

  • Be the executive decision-making body for the activities required to establish and promote the UDEF;
  • Identify sources of funds for those activities, and advise The Open Group on their application; and
  • Where appropriate, carry out some of those activities.

What is UDEF?
Universal Data Element Framework (UDEF), which was developed by the US CALS ISG in the late 1980s and early 1990s, represents is a small but potentially crucial aspect of information management: simplification of information management through consistent classification and assignment of a structured indexing identifier to the names (metadata) of data.

The concept is best illustrated by an example:

“Purchase Order Number” in a government invoice is a commonly-encountered data element. It has a UDEF description of Purchase.Order.DOCUMENT_Government.Assigned.IDENTIFIER and UDEF identifier d.t.2_13.35.8. UDEF descriptions and identifiers are assigned methodically and held in a Registry.

The value of doing this is that it eases the process of translating between different data description standards. Large companies often develop their own taxonomies and ontologies for the data that concerns them. But when they exchange information with their business partners, this information is generally described in ways other than their own. It may be described using a business partner’s data description method, or using one of a number of different data description standards such as RosettaNet or Open Applications Group Integration Specification (OAGIS). For example, the Purchase Order Number mentioned above is the OAGIS data element //Invoice/Header/DocumentReferences/PurchaseOrderDocumentReference/DocumentIds/DocumentId/Id. There may also be a need to translate information descriptions used by different departments within a single company. Making these translations is a messy and costly business. Having a simple, clear, and unambiguous standard classification removes confusion and cuts cost.

The availability of mappings between the UDEF and standards such as OAGIS will provide additional assistance to users, and will help cut costs further. Such mappings could be made available through the Registry or through repositories associated with it.

web site

Top of Page

Becoming accredited within The Open Group's IT Architect Certification Program
With the industry demand for highly qualified and experienced IT architects exploding, there is a growing need to establish a common industry-wide baseline for skills and expertise. Although there are number of companies that currently certify their staff as IT Architects, a common, industry-wide assessment with an independent assurance of competence is missing. This gap is now being closed with the upcoming independent accreditation provided by The Open Group.

Accreditation is a familiar term from higher education where it provides a review of the quality of higher education institutions and programs, and gives confidence to the public that the accredited programs meet quality standards. Similarly to higher education, the IT Architecture Certification Program accreditation provides verification that the accredited company or organization is managing their certification program according to the criteria established by the program. It can be attained by an organization whose internal certification or staff development programs have been assessed by The Open Group, and met the accreditation requirements.

There are a number of benefits for the companies to have their programs accredited. Using best practices, accredited programs will gain credibility, and get a globally accepted yardstick to measure skills and experience of their staff – a yardstick which their customers can trust, and which means the same every time. Organizations will be able to demonstrate to their customers and partners that they employ qualified individuals to lead their critical programs, and will be able to verify their status in The Open Group certification register. From a more global point of view, a recognized certification standard for an organization’s employees and help ensure further development and recognition of the IT architecture profession, and it will become a comparable cross industry benchmark.

So how does an organization become accredited? The accreditation process is straightforward. Any organization with IT architect certification or professional development program for certifying their own staff or contractors is eligible for assessment and may submit an application (as defined in the program’s Accreditation Policy). The applications are the assessed by The Open Group’s assessor. If the conformance requirements are met, the organization is accredited and listed in the register of accredited programs.

The process of accreditation was established to ensure a measure of uniformity for the process and requirements for managing an IT Architect certification program. The accreditation framework is intended to be flexible and provides for additional industry, cultural and organizational extensions to the base certification requirements. As a result confidential company methods remain confidential and secret.

Once an organization is accredited it may submit batches of IT architects for certification, and to manage its employee records within the Directory of Certified Architects.

Top of Page

Upcoming IT Architecture Certification program – call for endorsements
In July 2005, the IT Architecture Certification Program is scheduled to launch at The Open Group’s Architecture Practitioners Conference in New York: http://www.opengroup.org/new-york2005/

The program will establish an industry-wide standard for IT architects’ skill set and expertise, and create a foundation for trust between suppliers and customers. The Open Group will act as the certification authority. The program will provide accreditation of third-party IT architect certification programs as well as offer direct certification of individuals. For more details: http://www.opengroup.org/certification/itac-home.html

We want to make the launch a great success and would like to invite you to help and send us your statements of support. Make your voice be heard!

Please email us at: memnews-feedback@opengroup.org

Top of Page

TOGAF abstract published in a Dutch textbook
In its recent publication “De informtievoorzieningsarchitectuur als scharnier; Van strategie naar informatievoorziening” (Information Processing Architecture as a Pivot; From Strategy to Information Processing) Dutch publisher Academic Service featured a detailed abstract of TOGAF as one of the few freely available architecture development methods. The book is in Dutch and intended to be used in higher education. The book’s ISBN is 90 395 2336 3.

Top of Page

TOGAF Training
Demand for a “standard” set of training materials has been evident for some time. Organizations who wish to provide training to architects seeking TOGAF certification have asked for materials that are ready and packaged, rather than each having to create their own materials from scratch. This can be an onerous task, as the four-day training required brings with it a considerable development burden. For example, the early planning indication is that there will be over 450 slides, and TOGAF 8 itself has over 130 detailed graphics. All of these will be professionally packed into a complete class by an independent, experienced training developer for The Open Group.

We expect that this courseware will be available by August, and this is expected to be the first of a series of training materials and courseware. As part of the package, The Open Group will provide marketing support, promotion resources and templates – enabling an organization to quickly and effectively train their own architects or to become a certified TOGAF trainer. For more details contact Paul Hickey
email

Top of Page

Survey on the state of boundarylessness – call for input
The key catalyst that organizations can use to make progress towards the vision of Boundaryless Information Flow™ is enterprise architecture. Until recently, the concept of an enterprise IT architecture was a vision shared by very few organizations. Today, the concept of boundarylessness is becoming universally accepted as a desired state, and many companies have achieved it among their people only to find that the stovepipes are even stronger in the IT systems.

In an effort to continue the push for the global recognition of the our vision of Boundaryless Information Flow™, in Q4 2005 we plan to conduct a survey on the state of boundarylessness. We would like our members’ input. Share your thoughts and let us know your thoughts and ideas.
feedback

Top of Page

Telephony Online features The Fourth Volume of SLA Management Handbook
The Fourth Volume of SLA Management Handbook was featured in Telephony Online. The Open Group wrote it to add an enterprise point of view to the SLA requirements described in previous three volumes, which were written by the TeleManagement Forum.

Telephony describes and comments on the fourth volume, quotes Martin Kirk, Director of Enterprise Management Forum and Quality of Service Task Force on SLAs, and emphasizes that the fourth and final edition gives the service provider the tools to provide a true end-to-end SLA.

Read the article: http://telephonyonline.com/regulatory/news/telecom_hitchhikers_guide_service/

Top of Page

The Irish Computer Society teams with The Open Group on interoperability initiatives
The Irish Computer Society and The Open Group have announced two new initiatives designed to promote standards in the practice of IT architecture in Ireland and to provide enhanced access to global progress on interoperability and open standards. The former will involve the licensing of The Open Group's Architectural Framework Training Programme to the ICS to deliver training and certification at a local level. The second initiative sees the establishment of "The Open Group Network" for those with a special interest in IT architecture, open standards and interoperability. This will meet on a quarterly basis to share information about Open Group activities worldwide. The Open Group is a vendor-neutral and technology-neutral consortium which promotes access to integrated information. The Irish Computer Society was founded in 1967 as a not-for-profit organisation to act as an independent representative voice for the ICT industry in this country.

Top of Page

CONFERENCES

The IT Architecture Practitioners Conference Europe 2005 – A great success!
Dublin, April 25-27, 2005

Dublin conference, our most popular European event, with over 300 attendees from 25 countries, addressed some of the hottest topics in enterprise architecture - both from strategic and implementation points of view. At the forefront of discussions were the emerging profession of IT architecture, IT architecture methods, and the upcoming skills-based certification program for IT architects.

The conference was opened by Tom Kitt, T.D., Minister of State, Department of the Taoiseach, Repubic of Ireland, with special responsibility for the Information Society.

Allen Brown, President and CEO of The Open Group, spoke about IT architecture emerging as a profession, discussed its role, and emphasized that IT architecture and Boundaryless Information Flow™ go hand in hand: “IT architecture is critical to realizing the vision of Boundaryless Information Flow™.”

Len Fehskens of the Worldwide Architecture Profession Office, HP Services, shared his thoughts on what IT architecture is as a discipline and clarified the difference between architecture and design. He emphasized that architecture includes not only technology but also people and processes, and that it should be viewed as an explicit bridge between a business need and its IT solution.

A practitioner’s perspective on The Open Group’s IT Architect Certification Program, which is going to launch in July at The Open Group’s Architecture Practitioners Conference in New York was presented by Andras Szakal, Distinguished Engineer and Chief Architect, IBM Federal Software Group. He gave an overview of the program, the certification process, and the value proposition, and invited members to provide input and feedback on the proposed program. Szakal is a Senior Certified Software IT Architect within the IBM IT Architect Certification Program.

Michael Sylvia, Distinguished Engineer and IT Architect Profession Executive of IBM, shared his enthusiasm for the new program: “The Open Group’s IT Architect Certification Program, which will set a skill and experience-based standard for all practitioners, is a sign of the maturation of the industry. IBM is pleased to support it and is an active participant in its development.”

Tim Murfet, Head of Global Architecture & Core Technology - Europe, Accenture UK, spoke about the Accenture experience related to key challenges in an enterprise architecture practice, and discussed development of Accenture architects, where the key focus is on a method. Murfet praised The Open Group’s TOGAF methodology, which is similar to the Accenture approach.

Randolph Hite, Director of IT Architecture & Systems Issues, US Government Accountability Office, who spoke about the state of enterprise architecture maturity in the US Federal Government, also emphasized the importance of using an architecture development method. According to Hite, lots of agencies have a framework and tools but lack a method, and TOGAF could be very relevant for them.

Other speakers at the conference included Colm Butler, Principal Officer of the Information Society Policy Unit at the Department of the Taoiseach, Republic of Ireland; Juergen Bonn, Member of the Board, alfabet, Germany; Eric Boulay, CEO, Arismore, France; David Sprott, Founder and CEO, CBDI Forum, Ireland; Frank Chatonda,VP and Senior Architect, Citibank Technology Solution Group, USA; Rawls Whittlesey, Director, Enterprise Architecture, Delta Technology, USA; Uwe Weber, Head of Group Architecture Strategy, Detecon International GmbH, Germany; Eugen Oetringer, EDS, Netherlands; Theo Vassiliadis, Head of Interoperability Architecture & Methods, European Commission; Michiel Malotaux, VP Consulting & Enterprise Architect, Gartner Netherlands BV; Walter Stahlecker, Director of Industry Initiatives, Hewlett-Packard Company, Jeff Wolfers, Head of IT Strategy & Architecture, HSBC Holdings; Enrique Castro-Leon, Enterprise Architect and Strategist, Intel Solution Services, USA; Brian O'Byrne, Founder and CTO, Statesoft, Ireland; Jonathan Gregory, Enterprise Architect, Sun Microsystems, UK; Peter Hungerford, Senior Syngenta Fellow, Syngenta; Mark O’Neill, CEO, Vordel, Ireland; Stan Locke, Managing Director and COO of Zachman Framework Associates, Canada, among others.

Missed it? It is not too late to catch up on the key issues from the Proceedings here

Top of Page

Join Us for the IT Architecture Practitioners Conference 2005 –
            New York, The Westin New York at Times Square, July 18-20, 2005
            In parallel with Member meetings, July 18-22, 2005

Join us in New York this coming July for presentations on the practice and profession of enterprise architecture, highly practical workshops on the relationships of enterprise architecture to technology, to business transformation, and to ROI, and a review of in-depth case studies. Study the latest trends in enterprise architecture development, its

integration and necessary infrastructure support, and learn hands-on how to set up and run an Enterprise Architecture practice, and how to architect Boundaryless Information Flow™.

Plenary Speakers include Allen Brown, CEO, The Open Group; Mark Maier, The Aerospace Corporation; Len Fehskens, HP; Neil Levette, Chief Enterprise Architect, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat; Terence Blevins, The MITRE Corporation; Michael Sylvia, IBM; Dave Kuttler VP, Information Architecture, Johnson & Johnson; Shaw-Jen Chang, Senior Director, Enterprise Architecture, Cisco Systems; Andras Szakal, IBM; James DeRaeve, Vice President, Certification, The Open Group; Walter Stahlecker, Director of Industry Initiatives, Hewlett-Packard Co.

For full program including the parallel streams: http://www.opengroup.org/new-york2005/

Top of Page

Look ahead:
            Service Oriented Architectures Conference – Houston, TX, October 17-18, 2005
            
 In parallel with Member meetings, October 17-21, 2005

Allowing processes to interconnect easily in a flexible infrastructure based on business needs, the Service Oriented Architectures (SOA) approach is ideally suited to a modern dynamic enterprise. Properly managed and secured SOA can provide the reliability and interoperability that are the critical enablers of Boundaryless Information Flow™. Learn about the latest trends and advances, and how implementing SOA can help your company meet its goals, boost business effectiveness, and increase return on investment at each point of an agile IT infrastructure.

With an extensive track record in organizing premier industry events, The Open Group has put together an impressive lineup of practitioners, thought leaders and industry experts to share their perspectives, insights and experience in addressing one of today’s key IT architecture design approaches.

Who should attend:
CIOs, IT architects, IT strategists, senior IT managers, analysts, and industry experts

Learn about:

  • What the value proposition for SOA is, and how to communicate it within an organization
  • When a simple SOA project is sufficient, and when it's not
  • What the critical components are, if they are mature, and how to work with them
  • Which aspects of SOA should be implemented first and which later, and how to phase an SOA project so that each component has a positive ROI
  • How to identify problems and challenges that are appropriate for service-oriented solutions
  • How to implement for integration of SOA
  • How to implement resource management
  • What the status and direction of standards is
  • How to measure your SOA, and what are the key performance indicators

Get the information on what works and what doesn’t, network with your peers, and walk away with practical solutions. Get ideas on how to use SOA in building your enterprise architecture and making the most of your IT budget. The Open Group’s SOA conference has been designed to meet the needs of today’s busy IT professionals with practical guidance and solutions you can use.

Read more at http://www.opengroup.org/houston2005/

Top of Page

EVENTS

Featured Event: Digital Identity Management
July, 11 – 14, 2005, Hilton Olympia, London, UK

Over three days we will examine the key trends, threats and opportunities in digital identity management today, after a full- day workshop on how to develop, implement and administer a secure, effective digital identity management strategy.

For more information please visit http://www.iir-conferences.com/idman

Top of Page

Industry Events Calendar

Events of The Open Group
IT Architecture Practitioners Conference 2005
July 18-20, 2005
New York, USA
(in parallel with The Open Group Member Meetings, July 18-22, 2005)
http://www.opengroup.org/new-york2005/

Service Oriented Architectures Conference
October 17-18, 2005
Semantic Interoperability Conference
October 19-20, 2005
Houston, TX
(in parallel with The Open Group Member Meetings, October 17-21, 2005)
http://www.opengroup.org/houston2005/

Other Industry Events

Catalyst North America 2005
July 13-15, 2005
Manchester Grand Hyatt
San Diego, CA
https://www.burtongroup.com/catalyst/

Digital Identity Management
July 11-14, 2005
Hilton Olympia, London, UK
http://opengroup.org/events/DIM-summit2005.htm

EDOC 2005
September 19-23, 2005
Enschede, The Netherlands
http://www.edocconference.org/

TeleManagement
November 7-10, 2005
Adams Mark Convention Center, Dallas, TX
http://www.tmforum.org/browse.asp?catID=734&sNode=734&Exp=Y

Top of Page

THE WEB

Top Downloads from the Web
Top 10 publications downloads in April 2005
  1. The Single UNIX Specification, Version 3
  2. TOGAF, Version 8 'Enterprise Edition'
  3. Business Executive’s Guide to IT Architecture
  4. X/Open Single Sign-On Service (XSSO) - Pluggable Authentication
  5. Distributed TP: The XA Specification
  6. Security Design Patterns
  7. The Open Group IT Architect Certification Program
  8. Identity Management white paper
  9. DCE 1.1: Remote Procedure Call
  10. Common Data Security Architecture (CDSA) Version 2, with corrigenda

Top 10 page views in March 2005

  1. The Open Group home page
  2. The Base Specifications, Issue 6
  3. Bookstore main page
  4. Open Motif main page
  5. Architecture Forum main page
  6. The Single UNIX® Specification: Keyword search page
  7. TOGAF 8 welcome page
  8. Dublin 2005 conference program page
  9. Testing downloads page
  10. Open Motif downloads page

Top of Page

OTHER

Final Thoughts...
If you would like to send a letter to the editor for possible publication in the future, if you have any suggestions on what you would like to see covered, or if you have any comments on any published story or article, please email us at memnews-feedback@opengroup.org .

   
   |   Legal Notices & Terms of Use   |   Privacy Statement   |   Top of Page   Return to Top of Page