Managing the
Trend
Toward Increasing Use
of Electronic Messaging Tools
by Andrew Gilman, CommCore Consulting
Group
(Originally published in Messaging Magazine, May/June 1999)
Overview
The use of electronic communication in the modern business environment is exploding. Cell
phones and handheld devices are everywhere. For the work station environment, electronic
messaging is growing at exponential rates: independent voicemail and e-mail systems, as
well as the new hybrid systems combining both. The widespread acceptance of these
communication vehicles offers workers significant opportunities to build stronger,
interactive relationships with customers and employeesfor both internal and external
purposes.
This explosion in communications tools is, however, not without critical and challenging issues: privacy, etiquette, time management, and appropriateness of use. Users of these technologies must learn all the rules, cater to new communication preferences, and understand the assumptions brought into play when they adopt the use of e-mail and voicemail as business practices. In just one recent example, the U.S. v. Microsoft trial had many e-mails introduced into evidence that the senders thought had been erased. As a result, many companies today have begun to apply risk management tactics to e-mail use, periodically purging all e-mail from backup files, informing employees of newly minted policies regarding e-mail use, and monitoring all employee e-mail.
Other companies have taken a more positive proactive approach to establishing standards of use for voicemail and e-mail. Acting on the knowledge that electronic messaging is often the only way that individuals on separate continents and time zones interact, some businesses are investing in training programs for employees, teaching them the latest techniques for composing e-mail and voicemail messages that encourage a response.
In this article, we will explore general issues related to e-mail and voicemail and offer practical tips on how to better use the technologies.
The State of the Art: Electronic Interaction
Grows
The modern workplace exists within a 24-hour, global society. Workers have come to expect
the ability to access and transmit information at their convenience, without the old
limitations imposed by time and space barriers. Voice-mail has become a standard
convenience; many callers are surprised when the person they call does not have voicemail,
but instead relies on the seemingly archaic live message taker. E-mail transmission is
multiplying at an astonishing rateForrester Research (Boston) estimates that 60
million Americans now communicate electronicallydouble the numbers of just two years
ago. With all reports concluding the rest of the world is still playing catch-up with the
U.S. regarding Internet and e-mail use, the numbers will only keep ballooning.
Voicemail
First introduced in 1987, voicemail has pervaded the workplace. Both callers and those
they call have accepted it as a normal part of their work routine, and evolved with the
change. A variety of recent surveys (by Casio PhoneMate as reported in USA Today;
by CommCore Consulting Group with the Electronic Messaging Association (EMA) and the
Council of Communication Management (CCM)) have explored the impact voicemail and e-mail
have had on workers. (Complete results of the CommCore/EMA/CCM survey will be reported
in a future issue of @EMA.org, the newsletter of the EMA.) These studies report
workers receive numerous voicemail messages on a daily basis. Workers have adapted their
schedules to deal with the expectation they can be reached at any time; 40% check their
voicemail messages when they are not working, many make additional use of cell phones and
pagers to help them manage the incoming flow of information. And even voicemail is not
enoughnew technologies coming into vogue transfer calls or messages into a number of
formats, tracking message recipients down almost instantaneously by e-mail, cell phone or
pager, regardless of location.
E-Mail
As common as voicemail has become, e-mail use is quickly supplanting it. According to the
CommCore/EMA/CCM survey, e-mail use is increasing faster than voicemail use, and looks to
become the preferred method of communication. A recent Wall Street Journal article
reported the number of e-mail messages sent last year in the U.S. as 4 trillion, compared
to 107 billion pieces of first-class mail delivered by the Postal Service. While these
numbers included recreational users, they still indicate the magnitude with which
electronic messaging has invaded society.
New Technologies Bring New
OpportunitiesAnd New Fears
With the glut of electronic messaging, it is becoming increasingly necessary to start
setting standards of use simply to manage the influx of information and make efficient use
of the opportunities the technologies present. Anecdotal research among our clients
reveals they are just starting to recognize the place electronic messaging holds in the
relationship building process, and to prepare their employees to utilize the technologies
to maximize their effectiveness. These new training programs are a hybrid of technical and
content-oriented tips and techniques, addressing the needs of these communication vehicles
and the fears and expectations that come with their use.
Working with clients to establish quality standards for the use of electronic messaging, CommCore has gathered several common reasons these communication vehicles are growing so rapidly:
CommCore also noticed that whether technical or content-oriented, the new technologies offer their own set of frustrations, complaints, and fears:
These fears are not ungrounded, with recent highly publicized cases incorporating e-mail as evidence including the Microsoft case and the Presidential Impeachment/Lewinsky affair.
Companies have begun to set technical guidelines to prevent crises like these from hitting them. Monitoring of employee e-mailsfor content either inappropriate or confidentialis on the rise. 20% of companies read employee e-mails last year, up from 15% in 1997, according to the American Management Association. Many companies maintain separate internal and external e-mail systems to limit the possibility of mistaken (or intentional) transmission of confidential information to others; others place restrictions on the transmission or acceptance of attached files.
Using the Technology Effectively
Voice-mail and e-mail can be useful tools for communicating with busy people. These tools,
when used correctly, allow users to trade information accurately and efficiently. As in
any communications forum, good manners and techniques can help strengthen relationships,
while poor skillslike leaving long, rambling messages on voicemail or using the
Reply to All function to send information to uninterested partiescan prevent
information from reaching its intended audience.
When using electronic messaging tools to build relationships, it is extremely important to consider the audience and the demands for its time. Your voicemail may be one of 15-20 messages a person listens to at one time; your e-mail may be one of hundreds in someones in-box. Show your audience you understand that their time and attention are valuable. Respect that by keeping your messages concise, friendly, and meaningful, and you will better your chances of a response.
Whether you are a beginner or a more experienced user of electronic messaging tools, here are some specific tips to make your voicemail and e-mails more effective:
Voicemail
Conclusion
The use of electronic communications tools will continue to grow, from all opinions. Users
will explore and capitalize on the ease of use and savings of time and effort offered by
these technologies. The tools are important factors and can add great value to
relationship-building efforts. But even Bill Gates, seen perhaps as one of the strongest
supporters of the increasing role of electronic communications in our lives, acknowledges
in an interview with John Seabrook for the New Yorker:
"E-mail is a unique communication vehicle for a lot of reasons. However e-mail is not a substitute for direct interaction ".
This is the chief weakness of electronic messagingthe ease with which one can try to rely solely on the electronic methods of communication and limit their personal interaction. The CommCore/EMA/CCM survey revealed 20% of workers use e-mail specifically to avoid speaking with someone in person. And many call when they know the caller will not be there, and they can leave a message.
This is unfortunate, for while these electronic tools are excellent supplements to personal interaction, relying on them is dangerous. Voicemail and e-mail lack particular clues on how to receive the information in the messagebody language, tone, etc. Their informal nature and expectation that the messages be concise can also add to misunderstandings. In addition these methods make it difficult to know if the recipient has correctly understood the messageno eye contact or nodding heads to let the sender know.
However, despite the weaknesses inherent in the methods, voicemail and e-mail systems are excellent tools to support other relationship building efforts. E-mail and voicemail should remain a part of the communications tool kit, but not supplant other vehicles, especially face-to-face communications. Standards need to be set to ensure the tools are used properly. Noting the strengths, weaknesses, features and limitations of these technologies should be chief among setting electronic communications standards.
These standards include informing users about the benefits and limitations of the technologies, proper use and corporate policies, with attention to both technical and content issues. If properly set up, maintained, and communicated, these standards can help users control the deluge of interaction and information, and manage their use of these tools effectively. This, in turn, can minimize headaches for those executives charged with maintaining, improving, and/or implementing electronic messaging solutions, while at the same time supporting the use of electronic messaging tools for increased personalized outreach to key audiences. MM