Proposed resolutions are in the comment header block.
Updated 8 January 2004


 _____________________________________________________________________________
 COMMENT                                          Enhancement Request Number 1
 bmark                         Bug in COE_Linux_Gov_PS 2 (rdvk#  1)
 {IBM-006-03}                                    Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:39:49 GMT
 _____________________________________________________________________________
 Accept_____    Accept as marked below_____     Duplicate_____     Reject_X___
 Rationale for rejected or partial changes:

 The version information should not be in the product standard
 but held like version information for the test suites in
 a separate file.


 _____________________________________________________________________________
 Page: 1  Line: 1  Section: 1


 Problem:

 Do we state anywhere what particular *versions* of the Gov't supplied
 code will be allowed?

 Action:

 State the required minimum version level of the Gov't supplied code.


 _____________________________________________________________________________
 OBJECTION                                        Enhancement Request Number 2
 bmark                         Bug in COE_Linux_Gov_PS 2 (rdvk#  2)
 {IBM-004-03}                                    Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:39:49 GMT
 _____________________________________________________________________________
 Accept_____    Accept as marked below_X___     Duplicate_____     Reject_____
 Rationale for rejected or partial changes:

Change the wording as follows:
From:
"A COE Platform implementation shall demonstrate the ability to print ASCII
text and postscript graphics to both a locally attached printer and
a printer attached directly to the network. The following functions
are demonstrated:"
                                                                                
To:
"A COE Platform implementation shall demonstrate the ability to print
ASCII text and postscript graphics to both a locally attached printer
(if a device is supported) and a printer attached directly to the
network. The following functions are demonstrated:"


 _____________________________________________________________________________
 Page: 4  Line: 61  Section: 2


 Problem:

 COE has already been approved for machines that do not allow a
 "directly-attached" printer - for example, a logical partition on a
 mainframe.

 Action:

 Remove this requirement.